INFINITIVE STRUCTURES IN THE LANGUAGES OF CONTRAST

The article is devoted to a functional typology of infinitive structures in a number of European languages (English, German, Russian, Polish, Spanish and French), which is highly significant for contrastive linguistics and the theory of universals; specifically, it goes a long way to building a typology of sentence structures and establishing syntactic universals. The method of analysis is based on contrasting infinitive structures as part of inductively selected equivalent sentences of concrete languages with a language etalon. Representation of linguistic structures in each section of the language etalon corresponds to one of the four types: 1) universal (infinitive in all representations), 2) frequent (infinitive in a majority of representations), 3) marginal (infinitive in a minority of representations), 4) unique (infinitive in one representation only). The criterion of language structures representing the etalon is based on prototype as the most characteristic way of expressing meaning in a concrete language. The hypothesis of this study consists of two indissolubly united parts: 1) the structural type of language affects its capacity for employing infinitive, 2) employing infinitive results from the tendency to compress text. In general, the research shows considerable cross-linguistic similarity in the function of the infinitive as subject, predicate, object, attribute. Affinity with the etalon is determined by a number of syntactic functions of the infinitive in a clause; according to the decrement of this proximity the contrasted languages can be arranged from left to right in the following order: English → French → Spanish → German → Russian → Polish.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2025-496-2-7-14
Primary Topic
Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INFINITIVE STRUCTURES IN THE LANGUAGES OF CONTRAST

С. Г. Шафиков
Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University
Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies
article

INFINITIVE STRUCTURES IN THE LANGUAGES OF CONTRAST

С. Г. Шафиков
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to a functional typology of infinitive structures in a number of European languages (English, German, Russian, Polish, Spanish and French), which is highly significant for contrastive linguistics and the theory of universals; specifically, it goes a long way to building a typology of sentence structures and establishing syntactic universals. The method of analysis is based on contrasting infinitive structures as part of inductively selected equivalent sentences of concrete languages with a language etalon. Representation of linguistic structures in each section of the language etalon corresponds to one of the four types: 1) universal (infinitive in all representations), 2) frequent (infinitive in a majority of representations), 3) marginal (infinitive in a minority of representations), 4) unique (infinitive in one representation only). The criterion of language structures representing the etalon is based on prototype as the most characteristic way of expressing meaning in a concrete language. The hypothesis of this study consists of two indissolubly united parts: 1) the structural type of language affects its capacity for employing infinitive, 2) employing infinitive results from the tendency to compress text. In general, the research shows considerable cross-linguistic similarity in the function of the infinitive as subject, predicate, object, attribute. Affinity with the etalon is determined by a number of syntactic functions of the infinitive in a clause; according to the decrement of this proximity the contrasted languages can be arranged from left to right in the following order: English → French → Spanish → German → Russian → Polish.

Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State UniversityVol. 496(2)
University of Science and Technology (YE), Korea University of Science and Technology (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.