Diverging restoration pathways for overstory and understory communities in a Mediterranean‐climate riparian ecosystem

The classic restoration ecology model of ecosystem recovery predicts that restoring the initial conditions of a formerly degraded site will facilitate recovery and convergence with a reference site. Few restoration studies have long-term longitudinal data to evaluate recovery trajectories, which typically vary among different aspects of ecosystem structure and composition. We used repeat surveys to evaluate if the trajectory of vegetation structure and community composition in restored and reference forests converged from recovery of restored forest or degradation of reference forest, and whether patterns differed for forest overstories and understories. We measured vegetation communities 9-16 years after prior surveys and 21-30 years after planting in 11 restored and 8 reference forest sites along a 100-km span of the Sacramento River, California. We used generalized linear mixed models and nonmetric multidimensional scaling to evaluate convergence in overstory structure, overstory composition, understory cover, and understory composition. Restored forest structure became more similar to reference forests over time, converging on a basal area of ca. 20 m<sup>2</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup> around 25 years and densities of stems around 35 years. In contrast, overstory species composition remained distinctive, primarily due to the different initial tree-species composition and limited overlap in new species recruitment in restored and reference forests. Restored understories had lower native and higher exotic cover than reference sites in both surveys. Restored understory composition became more similar to reference sites as shade-intolerant exotic species cover declined. However, understory composition in restored sites remained distinct from reference sites due to the increased woody cover, primarily from the invasive, shade-tolerant shrub Rubus armeniacus, which increased from 2% to 23% mean site cover between the two surveys. Path analysis showed that in restored forests, R. armeniacus cover was negatively related (R = -0.51) to native understory cover, suggesting that it impedes forest recovery. Our results suggest that this system has converged with reference forest in overstory structure but not yet in overstory or understory composition. We found substantial degradation of restored forest understories over time due to R. armeniacus spread; redirecting this trend would require substantial, ongoing intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Applications
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.70043
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diverging restoration pathways for overstory and understory communities in a Mediterranean‐climate riparian ecosystem

John C. Stella, Brook Constantz, Karen D. Holl
4 citations
Ecological Applications
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
9.25
article

Diverging restoration pathways for overstory and understory communities in a Mediterranean‐climate riparian ecosystem

John C. Stella, Brook Constantz, Karen D. Holl
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The classic restoration ecology model of ecosystem recovery predicts that restoring the initial conditions of a formerly degraded site will facilitate recovery and convergence with a reference site. Few restoration studies have long-term longitudinal data to evaluate recovery trajectories, which typically vary among different aspects of ecosystem structure and composition. We used repeat surveys to evaluate if the trajectory of vegetation structure and community composition in restored and reference forests converged from recovery of restored forest or degradation of reference forest, and whether patterns differed for forest overstories and understories. We measured vegetation communities 9-16 years after prior surveys and 21-30 years after planting in 11 restored and 8 reference forest sites along a 100-km span of the Sacramento River, California. We used generalized linear mixed models and nonmetric multidimensional scaling to evaluate convergence in overstory structure, overstory composition, understory cover, and understory composition. Restored forest structure became more similar to reference forests over time, converging on a basal area of ca. 20 m<sup>2</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup> around 25 years and densities of stems around 35 years. In contrast, overstory species composition remained distinctive, primarily due to the different initial tree-species composition and limited overlap in new species recruitment in restored and reference forests. Restored understories had lower native and higher exotic cover than reference sites in both surveys. Restored understory composition became more similar to reference sites as shade-intolerant exotic species cover declined. However, understory composition in restored sites remained distinct from reference sites due to the increased woody cover, primarily from the invasive, shade-tolerant shrub Rubus armeniacus, which increased from 2% to 23% mean site cover between the two surveys. Path analysis showed that in restored forests, R. armeniacus cover was negatively related (R = -0.51) to native understory cover, suggesting that it impedes forest recovery. Our results suggest that this system has converged with reference forest in overstory structure but not yet in overstory or understory composition. We found substantial degradation of restored forest understories over time due to R. armeniacus spread; redirecting this trend would require substantial, ongoing intervention.

Ecological ApplicationsVol. 35(3)
State University of New York (US), SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), York University (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
9.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.