Comparison of trabeculotomy ab externo outcomes between resident physicians and supervising ophthalmologists using propensity score matching

This study compared the surgical performance of resident doctors and their supervising ophthalmic surgeons in trabeculotomy (LOT) ab externo using propensity score matching. We retrospectively analyzed surgical data on 248 eyes that underwent LOT ab externo at our hospital between April 2016 and December 2022. The procedures were performed by three full-time supervising ophthalmologists (≥ 5 years of experience) and 12 resident physicians (< 5 years of experience). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for significant variables identified through univariate analysis of five covariates: preoperative visual acuity, preoperative intraocular pressure [IOP], preoperative ophthalmoscopy score, presence of preoperative pseudophakia, and concomitant cataract surgery. Postoperative outcomes including IOP, eye drop scores, and complications, were evaluated at 3-month intervals up to 24 months. Survival curves showed no significant difference between the eyes operated by resident physicians and those by supervising ophthalmologists (P = 0.183). The median change in IOP (first quartile-third quartile) was also comparable between the two groups (P = 0.234). Furthermore, both groups had similar rates of anterior chamber hemorrhage and transient IOP elevation (P = 0.577 and 0.85, respectively). These findings suggest that resident physicians can achieve surgical outcomes and complication rates comparable to those of their supervising ophthalmic surgeons when performing LOT ab externo.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01151-7
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of trabeculotomy ab externo outcomes between resident physicians and supervising ophthalmologists using propensity score matching

Hirokazu Nisiwaki, Tomoaki Sakamoto
Scientific Reports
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Comparison of trabeculotomy ab externo outcomes between resident physicians and supervising ophthalmologists using propensity score matching

Hirokazu Nisiwaki, Tomoaki Sakamoto
article en

Abstract

This study compared the surgical performance of resident doctors and their supervising ophthalmic surgeons in trabeculotomy (LOT) ab externo using propensity score matching. We retrospectively analyzed surgical data on 248 eyes that underwent LOT ab externo at our hospital between April 2016 and December 2022. The procedures were performed by three full-time supervising ophthalmologists (≥ 5 years of experience) and 12 resident physicians (< 5 years of experience). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for significant variables identified through univariate analysis of five covariates: preoperative visual acuity, preoperative intraocular pressure [IOP], preoperative ophthalmoscopy score, presence of preoperative pseudophakia, and concomitant cataract surgery. Postoperative outcomes including IOP, eye drop scores, and complications, were evaluated at 3-month intervals up to 24 months. Survival curves showed no significant difference between the eyes operated by resident physicians and those by supervising ophthalmologists (P = 0.183). The median change in IOP (first quartile-third quartile) was also comparable between the two groups (P = 0.234). Furthermore, both groups had similar rates of anterior chamber hemorrhage and transient IOP elevation (P = 0.577 and 0.85, respectively). These findings suggest that resident physicians can achieve surgical outcomes and complication rates comparable to those of their supervising ophthalmic surgeons when performing LOT ab externo.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Tenri Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.