Performance of five large language models in managing acute dental pain: A comprehensive analysis

While LLMs can benefit patient care, research, and education in healthcare sector, they also pose risks such as misinformation dissemination, privacy breaches, and data bias (2,3).In recent years, AI has gained significant traction in dentistry, especially in answering questions in several areas such as dental trauma, maxillofacial surgery, and pediatric dentistry (4,5).LLMs have emerged as an effective tool to facilitate easier access to best practices in dentistry by pro-Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate and compare five large language models (LLMs) used in the pharmacologic management of acute dental pain based on the following parameters: Comprehensiveness, scientific accuracy, clarity, relevance, and similarity of information they provide.Methods: For this study, 20 open-ended questions were asked from five LLMs, namely ChatGPT-4.0,Gemini Advanced, Claude, Copilot, and Perplexity, and their responses were evaluated by two experts based on American Dental Association guidelines.Their scores ranged from 0 to 10, and the iThenticate program was used to assess the similarity indices.Statistical analyses included the Friedman and Dunn tests, with significance level set at p < 0.05. Results:Claude and ChatGPT-4o scored the highest in terms of comprehensiveness, scientific accuracy, clarity, and relevance, while Copilot and Perplexity scored the lowest.Claude had the lowest similarity index (3 5 %), and ChatGPT-4o had the highest (7 8 %).Statistical analysis showed significant differences among the five LLMs (p < 0.001).While Claude, ChatGPT-4o, and Gemini Advanced performed in similar ways, they significantly outperformed Copilot and Perplexity. Conclusion:According to the findings of this study, Claude and ChatGPT-4o provided the most accurate and comprehensive responses; however, LLMs cannot replace clinical guidelines.These findings highlight the potential of LLMs in supporting clinicians and underscore the scope for further improvement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Turkish Endodontic Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14744/tej.2025.27147
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental Research and COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of five large language models in managing acute dental pain: A comprehensive analysis

Büşra Tosun
2 citations
Turkish Endodontic Journal
Dental Research and COVID-19
5.65
article

Performance of five large language models in managing acute dental pain: A comprehensive analysis

Büşra Tosun
article en
2 citations

Abstract

While LLMs can benefit patient care, research, and education in healthcare sector, they also pose risks such as misinformation dissemination, privacy breaches, and data bias (2,3).In recent years, AI has gained significant traction in dentistry, especially in answering questions in several areas such as dental trauma, maxillofacial surgery, and pediatric dentistry (4,5).LLMs have emerged as an effective tool to facilitate easier access to best practices in dentistry by pro-Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate and compare five large language models (LLMs) used in the pharmacologic management of acute dental pain based on the following parameters: Comprehensiveness, scientific accuracy, clarity, relevance, and similarity of information they provide.Methods: For this study, 20 open-ended questions were asked from five LLMs, namely ChatGPT-4.0,Gemini Advanced, Claude, Copilot, and Perplexity, and their responses were evaluated by two experts based on American Dental Association guidelines.Their scores ranged from 0 to 10, and the iThenticate program was used to assess the similarity indices.Statistical analyses included the Friedman and Dunn tests, with significance level set at p < 0.05. Results:Claude and ChatGPT-4o scored the highest in terms of comprehensiveness, scientific accuracy, clarity, and relevance, while Copilot and Perplexity scored the lowest.Claude had the lowest similarity index (3 5 %), and ChatGPT-4o had the highest (7 8 %).Statistical analysis showed significant differences among the five LLMs (p < 0.001).While Claude, ChatGPT-4o, and Gemini Advanced performed in similar ways, they significantly outperformed Copilot and Perplexity. Conclusion:According to the findings of this study, Claude and ChatGPT-4o provided the most accurate and comprehensive responses; however, LLMs cannot replace clinical guidelines.These findings highlight the potential of LLMs in supporting clinicians and underscore the scope for further improvement.

Turkish Endodontic Journal
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dental Research and COVID-19
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance of five large language models in managing acute dental pain: A comprehensive analysis — Büşra Tosun · Turkish Endodontic Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS