State Health-Medical Liability: Reflections from the Philosophy of Law and Contemporary Justice

In Colombia, the healthcare system was implemented through Law 100 of 1993 and its complementary regulations, giving rise to the General System of Social Security in Health (SGSSS) and the Comprehensive Social Security System (SSSI). These systems are structured around four fundamental thematic axes: (i) public health, (ii) patients’ rights, risk management, and ethical and institutional responsibilities, (iii) system financing, and (iv) health technologies. Based on this normative and functional structure, the need arises to strengthen legality and policy in the field of healthcare. Within this framework, the proposal is made to implement an Autonomous Medical-Sanitary Liability Regime and to establish a specialized jurisdiction for the judicial review of medical acts in Colombia, grounded in distributive justice and the State’s duty of care. This initiative seeks to respond to the particularities of the healthcare system, ensuring an appropriate legal framework for the resolution of conflicts in the healthcare domain. The philosophical-legal, constitutional, and conventional analysis has consolidated the recognition of health as a constitutionally protected good, a fundamental right, and a constitutional social right, shaping a model based on Structural Pluralism. In this context, affiliation with and contribution to the healthcare system not only constitute a legal obligation but also materialize the citizen’s relationship with the healthcare structure. Methodologically, this study adopts a qualitative approach using a critical hermeneutic method, which enables the interpretation and analysis of the regulatory and doctrinal framework concerning medical liability. Additionally, the technique of expert interviews is employed, allowing for a deeper understanding of the legal and operational issues within Colombia’s healthcare system. Based on this analysis, the feasibility and necessity of establishing an autonomous regime of medical-sanitary liability is substantiated, complemented by a specialized jurisdiction that ensures efficient justice administration aligned with the specificities of the health sector. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/rcp.1122

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/rcp.1122
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State Health-Medical Liability: Reflections from the Philosophy of Law and Contemporary Justice

Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

State Health-Medical Liability: Reflections from the Philosophy of Law and Contemporary Justice

article en

Abstract

In Colombia, the healthcare system was implemented through Law 100 of 1993 and its complementary regulations, giving rise to the General System of Social Security in Health (SGSSS) and the Comprehensive Social Security System (SSSI). These systems are structured around four fundamental thematic axes: (i) public health, (ii) patients’ rights, risk management, and ethical and institutional responsibilities, (iii) system financing, and (iv) health technologies. Based on this normative and functional structure, the need arises to strengthen legality and policy in the field of healthcare. Within this framework, the proposal is made to implement an Autonomous Medical-Sanitary Liability Regime and to establish a specialized jurisdiction for the judicial review of medical acts in Colombia, grounded in distributive justice and the State’s duty of care. This initiative seeks to respond to the particularities of the healthcare system, ensuring an appropriate legal framework for the resolution of conflicts in the healthcare domain. The philosophical-legal, constitutional, and conventional analysis has consolidated the recognition of health as a constitutionally protected good, a fundamental right, and a constitutional social right, shaping a model based on Structural Pluralism. In this context, affiliation with and contribution to the healthcare system not only constitute a legal obligation but also materialize the citizen’s relationship with the healthcare structure. Methodologically, this study adopts a qualitative approach using a critical hermeneutic method, which enables the interpretation and analysis of the regulatory and doctrinal framework concerning medical liability. Additionally, the technique of expert interviews is employed, allowing for a deeper understanding of the legal and operational issues within Colombia’s healthcare system. Based on this analysis, the feasibility and necessity of establishing an autonomous regime of medical-sanitary liability is substantiated, complemented by a specialized jurisdiction that ensures efficient justice administration aligned with the specificities of the health sector. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/rcp.1122

Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

State Health-Medical Liability: Reflections from the Philosophy of Law and Contemporary Justice · Review of Contemporary Philosophy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS