Beyond the Scar: VBAC vs ERCD – Exploring Best Delivery Option for Women with Prior Caesarean sections

Objective: To evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes and risks associated with Vaginal Birth after Caesarean (VBAC) versus Elective Repeat Caesarean Delivery (ERCD), in order to determine the safest and most appropriate mode of delivery among women presenting with prior Caesarean section history. Methodology: This is a randomized controlled trial conducted from ERCD from January to December 2023 at Obs $ Gynae Dept. Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Quaid-e-Azam Medical College Bahawalpur. A total of 150 to either VBAC or ERCD would be included. The results of maternal morbidity included bleeding, infection, and uterine rupture. Neonatal health was assessed using Apgar scores, NICU admission rates, and early neonatal mortality. Maternal satisfaction and postpartum depression were measured against the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). SPSS version 26 was used for data entry and analysis. Results: Mean age of 29.3 ± 3.8 years was in VBAC group and 28.15 ± 2.7 years in the ERCD group. Uterine rupture was significantly higher in the VBAC group (8% vs. 0%, p = 0.027), while hemorrhage >1000 ml was more frequent in VBAC (6.67% vs. 1.33%, p = 0.067) and infection rate was slightly higher in the VBAC group (4% vs. 2.67%). Additionally ERCD group showed better neonatal outcomes, including higher Apgar scores and fewer NICU admissions (8% vs. 30.67%) p = <0.05. However, uterine rupture was significantly more common in the VBAC group (8%, p = 0.027). Maternal satisfaction was similar in both groups, but postpartum depression was more frequent in the ERCD group (21% vs. 13%, p = 0.037). Conclusion: ERCD observed to be the safer option overall, particularly in terms of neonatal outcomes and reduced maternal complications, while it may be associated with higher emotional costs, including an increased risk of postpartum depression. In parallel, VBAC offers the advantage of natural birth and similar maternal satisfaction but carries a higher risk of complications and require a strict monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Pakistan
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71104/jsogp.v15i2.904
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Scar: VBAC vs ERCD – Exploring Best Delivery Option for Women with Prior Caesarean sections

Noor Aman Hamid, Khiaynat Sarwar Hashmi, Farhana Shabnam, Sarwat Faridi et al.
1 links
Journal of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Pakistan
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Beyond the Scar: VBAC vs ERCD – Exploring Best Delivery Option for Women with Prior Caesarean sections

Noor Aman Hamid, Khiaynat Sarwar Hashmi, Farhana Shabnam, Sarwat Faridi, Maria Rasheed, Alia Masood
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes and risks associated with Vaginal Birth after Caesarean (VBAC) versus Elective Repeat Caesarean Delivery (ERCD), in order to determine the safest and most appropriate mode of delivery among women presenting with prior Caesarean section history. Methodology: This is a randomized controlled trial conducted from ERCD from January to December 2023 at Obs $ Gynae Dept. Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Quaid-e-Azam Medical College Bahawalpur. A total of 150 to either VBAC or ERCD would be included. The results of maternal morbidity included bleeding, infection, and uterine rupture. Neonatal health was assessed using Apgar scores, NICU admission rates, and early neonatal mortality. Maternal satisfaction and postpartum depression were measured against the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). SPSS version 26 was used for data entry and analysis. Results: Mean age of 29.3 ± 3.8 years was in VBAC group and 28.15 ± 2.7 years in the ERCD group. Uterine rupture was significantly higher in the VBAC group (8% vs. 0%, p = 0.027), while hemorrhage >1000 ml was more frequent in VBAC (6.67% vs. 1.33%, p = 0.067) and infection rate was slightly higher in the VBAC group (4% vs. 2.67%). Additionally ERCD group showed better neonatal outcomes, including higher Apgar scores and fewer NICU admissions (8% vs. 30.67%) p = <0.05. However, uterine rupture was significantly more common in the VBAC group (8%, p = 0.027). Maternal satisfaction was similar in both groups, but postpartum depression was more frequent in the ERCD group (21% vs. 13%, p = 0.037). Conclusion: ERCD observed to be the safer option overall, particularly in terms of neonatal outcomes and reduced maternal complications, while it may be associated with higher emotional costs, including an increased risk of postpartum depression. In parallel, VBAC offers the advantage of natural birth and similar maternal satisfaction but carries a higher risk of complications and require a strict monitoring.

Journal of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of PakistanVol. 15(2)
Rawalpindi Medical University (PK), Nishtar Medical College and Hospital (PK), Government Sadiq College Women University (PK), Bahawal Victoria Hospital (PK), Shaikh Zayed Medical College and Hospital (PK), Jinnah Medical & Dental College (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.