Why Peacekeeping Operations Failed: Taking AMISOM as an Example

This article investigates the sustained failures of United Nations peacekeeping operations from the perspectives of liberalism and critical international relations theory, with the African Union Mission in Somalia (Somalia) as the main case study. Liberalism emphasizes institutional constraints, coordination issues, and excessive reliance on external support, while critical theory exposes deeper structural issues such as the dynamics of new colonial power, marginalization of local institutions, and global inequality in peacekeeping practices. Analysis suggests that current peace operations often prioritize regional security and donor interests over sustainable peace and inclusive governance. By drawing on local governance experiments in the Kurdish region of Syria, a shift towards a locally led, inclusive, and context sensitive peacekeeping model has been proposed, which emphasizes political legitimacy, cultural diversity, and bottom-up change.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Security and Administration Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23977/socsam.2025.060106
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Peacekeeping Operations Failed: Taking AMISOM as an Example

Social Security and Administration Management
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Why Peacekeeping Operations Failed: Taking AMISOM as an Example

article en

Abstract

This article investigates the sustained failures of United Nations peacekeeping operations from the perspectives of liberalism and critical international relations theory, with the African Union Mission in Somalia (Somalia) as the main case study. Liberalism emphasizes institutional constraints, coordination issues, and excessive reliance on external support, while critical theory exposes deeper structural issues such as the dynamics of new colonial power, marginalization of local institutions, and global inequality in peacekeeping practices. Analysis suggests that current peace operations often prioritize regional security and donor interests over sustainable peace and inclusive governance. By drawing on local governance experiments in the Kurdish region of Syria, a shift towards a locally led, inclusive, and context sensitive peacekeeping model has been proposed, which emphasizes political legitimacy, cultural diversity, and bottom-up change.

Social Security and Administration ManagementVol. 6(1)
Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.