Clinical Verification and Effect Evaluation of Chronic Disease Management Model for Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation in Remission Period

本研究旨在验证和评价缓解期腰突患者慢病管理模式的临床效果。通过随机对照试验,纳入102例腰椎间盘突出症患者,分为对照组(传统治疗)和干预组(传统治疗联合慢病管理组),对比两组患者的疼痛程度(VAS评分)、腰椎功能(JOA评分)及满意度。结果显示,干预组在治疗4周及随访3、6、12个月时,VAS评分显著低于对照组(均P This study aims to verify and evaluate the clinical effect of the chronic disease management model for patients with lumbar disc herniation in the remission period. Through a randomized controlled trial, 102 patients with lumbar disc herniation were enrolled and divided into a control group (conventional treatment) and an intervention group (conventional treatment combined with a chronic disease management group). The pain levels (VAS scores), lumbar function (JOA scores), and satisfaction of the two groups were compared. The results showed that at 4 weeks of treatment and during the 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-ups, the VAS scores of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the control group (all P < 0.05), the JOA scores of the intervention group were significantly higher than those of the control group (all P < 0.05), and the patient satisfaction in the intervention group reached 94.1%, which was significantly better than 78.4% in the control group. The conclusion indicates that the chronic disease management model can effectively relieve pain, improve function, and increase patient satisfaction, providing a scientific basis for the management of lumbar disc herniation in the community.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1551381
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Verification and Effect Evaluation of Chronic Disease Management Model for Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation in Remission Period

建平 王
Advances in Clinical Medicine
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Clinical Verification and Effect Evaluation of Chronic Disease Management Model for Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation in Remission Period

建平 王
article en

Abstract

本研究旨在验证和评价缓解期腰突患者慢病管理模式的临床效果。通过随机对照试验,纳入102例腰椎间盘突出症患者,分为对照组(传统治疗)和干预组(传统治疗联合慢病管理组),对比两组患者的疼痛程度(VAS评分)、腰椎功能(JOA评分)及满意度。结果显示,干预组在治疗4周及随访3、6、12个月时,VAS评分显著低于对照组(均P This study aims to verify and evaluate the clinical effect of the chronic disease management model for patients with lumbar disc herniation in the remission period. Through a randomized controlled trial, 102 patients with lumbar disc herniation were enrolled and divided into a control group (conventional treatment) and an intervention group (conventional treatment combined with a chronic disease management group). The pain levels (VAS scores), lumbar function (JOA scores), and satisfaction of the two groups were compared. The results showed that at 4 weeks of treatment and during the 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-ups, the VAS scores of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the control group (all P < 0.05), the JOA scores of the intervention group were significantly higher than those of the control group (all P < 0.05), and the patient satisfaction in the intervention group reached 94.1%, which was significantly better than 78.4% in the control group. The conclusion indicates that the chronic disease management model can effectively relieve pain, improve function, and increase patient satisfaction, providing a scientific basis for the management of lumbar disc herniation in the community.

Advances in Clinical MedicineVol. 15(05)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.