How to conceptualize teaching quality in the future: some confirming, some complementary, and some critical remarks, and some of them hopefully helpful

This commentary discusses whether the problem motivating this special issue, that is, the frequently small and inconsistent effects of teaching-quality indicators, is the main problem of research on teaching quality. The core problem might actually be a suboptimal theoretical foundation, a common problem in research on learning and instruction. Against this background, one of the main strengths of this special issue’s articles is that they elaborate on the importance of theory. They describe very profound analyses of the shortcomings of past and current research on teaching quality, leading to highly ambitious proposals for future research. However, we also need to define realistic, doable goals to advance research on teaching quality in the near future. For this purpose, we propose a type of argumentative validity perspective on teaching quality, that is, developing conceptualizations of teaching quality that are valid when addressing specific research goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2025.2482580
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to conceptualize teaching quality in the future: some confirming, some complementary, and some critical remarks, and some of them hopefully helpful

Tino Endres, Alexander Renkl
2 citations
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
17.85
article

How to conceptualize teaching quality in the future: some confirming, some complementary, and some critical remarks, and some of them hopefully helpful

Tino Endres, Alexander Renkl
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This commentary discusses whether the problem motivating this special issue, that is, the frequently small and inconsistent effects of teaching-quality indicators, is the main problem of research on teaching quality. The core problem might actually be a suboptimal theoretical foundation, a common problem in research on learning and instruction. Against this background, one of the main strengths of this special issue’s articles is that they elaborate on the importance of theory. They describe very profound analyses of the shortcomings of past and current research on teaching quality, leading to highly ambitious proposals for future research. However, we also need to define realistic, doable goals to advance research on teaching quality in the near future. For this purpose, we propose a type of argumentative validity perspective on teaching quality, that is, developing conceptualizations of teaching quality that are valid when addressing specific research goals.

School Effectiveness and School ImprovementVol. 36(2)
University of Freiburg (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.