Declining conifer productivity will drive future forest dynamics as climate changes in northern New England

Climate change is expected to decrease habitat suitability for conifers in the mixed species, temperate forests of New England in the northeastern United States. How existing forests will be affected during the transition from current to future growing conditions, however, is less clear and has important implications for commercially managed forests and the growing interest in forest carbon as a natural climate solution. We used the LANDIS-II forest landscape model to simulate climate change under two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5) and interactions with timber harvesting under the predominant harvest regime across 4 million ha of managed forestland in Maine. Using a factorial design, we compared the relative and cumulative impacts of predicted changes in species' maximum annual net primary productivity or establishment probability on trends in live, aboveground biomass (2010-2100). In addition to area-wide scenario comparison, we evaluated variation in local outcomes (n = 356 townships or ~100 km<sup>2</sup> land units) to better inform adaptation at a scale relevant to forest management. Although broadleaf productivity was predicted to be generally resistant to regional increases in temperature and precipitation, projections suggested climate change will have a negative effect on area-wide biomass, driven predominantly by declines in conifer productivity. Nonetheless, conifers (specifically balsam fir [Abies balsamea] and red spruce [Picea rubens]) will likely remain the area's most productive species; consequently, across climate scenarios there was a positive correlation (r = 0.68-0.82) between percent change in local biomass density and percent change in conifer biomass. Simulations also suggested that even with climate change, regional harvest supply could be maintained over the next 70-80 years; however, current harvest rates and practices may become unsustainable across an increasingly large area as conifer productivity declines. In addition, species establishment probability is likely to decline for many broadleaf and conifer trees, which will be particularly impactful in harvested areas with insufficient regeneration. Overall, our results suggest the forests in northern New England will continue to be an aboveground carbon sink over this century, but without adaptive management to improve forest resistance and resilience to climate change, it will be a sink of diminishing capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Applications
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.70028
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Declining conifer productivity will drive future forest dynamics as climate changes in northern New England

Erin Simons‐Legaard, Aaron R. Weiskittel, Kasey R. Legaard
2 citations
Ecological Applications
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.21
article

Declining conifer productivity will drive future forest dynamics as climate changes in northern New England

Erin Simons‐Legaard, Aaron R. Weiskittel, Kasey R. Legaard
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Climate change is expected to decrease habitat suitability for conifers in the mixed species, temperate forests of New England in the northeastern United States. How existing forests will be affected during the transition from current to future growing conditions, however, is less clear and has important implications for commercially managed forests and the growing interest in forest carbon as a natural climate solution. We used the LANDIS-II forest landscape model to simulate climate change under two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5) and interactions with timber harvesting under the predominant harvest regime across 4 million ha of managed forestland in Maine. Using a factorial design, we compared the relative and cumulative impacts of predicted changes in species' maximum annual net primary productivity or establishment probability on trends in live, aboveground biomass (2010-2100). In addition to area-wide scenario comparison, we evaluated variation in local outcomes (n = 356 townships or ~100 km<sup>2</sup> land units) to better inform adaptation at a scale relevant to forest management. Although broadleaf productivity was predicted to be generally resistant to regional increases in temperature and precipitation, projections suggested climate change will have a negative effect on area-wide biomass, driven predominantly by declines in conifer productivity. Nonetheless, conifers (specifically balsam fir [Abies balsamea] and red spruce [Picea rubens]) will likely remain the area's most productive species; consequently, across climate scenarios there was a positive correlation (r = 0.68-0.82) between percent change in local biomass density and percent change in conifer biomass. Simulations also suggested that even with climate change, regional harvest supply could be maintained over the next 70-80 years; however, current harvest rates and practices may become unsustainable across an increasingly large area as conifer productivity declines. In addition, species establishment probability is likely to decline for many broadleaf and conifer trees, which will be particularly impactful in harvested areas with insufficient regeneration. Overall, our results suggest the forests in northern New England will continue to be an aboveground carbon sink over this century, but without adaptive management to improve forest resistance and resilience to climate change, it will be a sink of diminishing capacity.

Ecological ApplicationsVol. 35(3)
University of Maine (US)
Directorate for Biological Sciences, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Earth Sciences Division, Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.