Two sides of the same coin: the Darjeeling tea saga and the need to reform the legal protection of geographical indications

The TRIPS Agreement provides a minimum standard of protection for geographical indications (GIs) concerning rural nations. This paper explores the intricate dynamics of the international protection of GIs through trademark protection, sui generis protection, and international treaties, which are an integral part of the IPR legal arsenal, fostering equitable competition and instilling confidence in consumers. This debate is culminated in the Darjeeling tea saga, which aptly illustrates the challenges that rural nations such as India may have while pursuing GI protection. This paper aims to comprehensively evaluate the effects of trademark protection and sui generis protection on the relevant stakeholders including producers, consumers, local economies, and international commerce at large. The ultimate goal is to provide policymakers, legal practitioners, and stakeholders with insights into the complex factors that must be taken into account when safeguarding GIs in the contemporary global market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Intellectual Property Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijipm.2025.146209
Primary Topic
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two sides of the same coin: the Darjeeling tea saga and the need to reform the legal protection of geographical indications

Nikolaos Voutyrakos, Aneela Fatima
International Journal of Intellectual Property Management
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
article

Two sides of the same coin: the Darjeeling tea saga and the need to reform the legal protection of geographical indications

Nikolaos Voutyrakos, Aneela Fatima
article en

Abstract

The TRIPS Agreement provides a minimum standard of protection for geographical indications (GIs) concerning rural nations. This paper explores the intricate dynamics of the international protection of GIs through trademark protection, sui generis protection, and international treaties, which are an integral part of the IPR legal arsenal, fostering equitable competition and instilling confidence in consumers. This debate is culminated in the Darjeeling tea saga, which aptly illustrates the challenges that rural nations such as India may have while pursuing GI protection. This paper aims to comprehensively evaluate the effects of trademark protection and sui generis protection on the relevant stakeholders including producers, consumers, local economies, and international commerce at large. The ultimate goal is to provide policymakers, legal practitioners, and stakeholders with insights into the complex factors that must be taken into account when safeguarding GIs in the contemporary global market.

International Journal of Intellectual Property ManagementVol. 15(3)
O. P. Jindal Global University (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.