Implications of Labeling the Criminal Armed Group in Papua as a Terrorist Organization

<em><span>Conflict and bloodshed continue in Papua, whether by governmental actors or the Criminal Armed Group. The Coordinating Ministry for Politics, Law, and Security declared the KKB in Papua a terrorist organisation in 2021 after classifying it as a separatist organisation. This study aims to look into what it means that the Papuan government called the KKB a "terrorist organisation." In this article, socio-legal research examines whether labelling the Papuan KKB as a terrorist group is legal and what that means. It also includes interviews with state security experts and Papua experts. The study's results showed that labelling the Papuan KKB as a terrorist group could make the security and human rights situation in Papua worse by fostering more violence and separating peace. The government's application of force may prolong the cycle of violence and human rights violations. The name does not comply with legal standards since it should have been established through a transparent judicial process rather than by the Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal, and Security Affairs. For sustainable conflict resolution in Papua New Guinea, a technique that incorporates broader participation and is founded on discussion is essential</span></em>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v14i1.93621
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implications of Labeling the Criminal Armed Group in Papua as a Terrorist Organization

Heru Kurniawan, Milda Istiqomah, Raras Natasya Anindita
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum
Asian Studies and History
article

Implications of Labeling the Criminal Armed Group in Papua as a Terrorist Organization

Heru Kurniawan, Milda Istiqomah, Raras Natasya Anindita
article en

Abstract

<em><span>Conflict and bloodshed continue in Papua, whether by governmental actors or the Criminal Armed Group. The Coordinating Ministry for Politics, Law, and Security declared the KKB in Papua a terrorist organisation in 2021 after classifying it as a separatist organisation. This study aims to look into what it means that the Papuan government called the KKB a "terrorist organisation." In this article, socio-legal research examines whether labelling the Papuan KKB as a terrorist group is legal and what that means. It also includes interviews with state security experts and Papua experts. The study's results showed that labelling the Papuan KKB as a terrorist group could make the security and human rights situation in Papua worse by fostering more violence and separating peace. The government's application of force may prolong the cycle of violence and human rights violations. The name does not comply with legal standards since it should have been established through a transparent judicial process rather than by the Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal, and Security Affairs. For sustainable conflict resolution in Papua New Guinea, a technique that incorporates broader participation and is founded on discussion is essential</span></em>

Yustisia Jurnal HukumVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implications of Labeling the Criminal Armed Group in Papua as a Terrorist Organization — Heru Kurniawan, Milda Istiqomah, et al. · Yustisia Jurnal Hukum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS