The human as consumer of biotechnology: Risks and prospects of the technological boom

The relevance of this article was driven by the need to identify the risks faced by humans as consumers of biotechnology. Enthralled by its possibilities, consumers often overlook how the resulting changes may impact their lives. The study aimed to explore the ambiguities associated with using biotechnology in contemporary society. To achieve this, phenomenological, interpretative, and analytical methods were employed. The findings confirmed that modern advancements offer boundless opportunities – in medicine (such as artificial organ creation and life extension), energy (including biofuel production and environmental remediation), and genetic modification (of both humans and animals). However, these advancements also pose immense challenges, demanding a high level of responsibility from both scientists, who are increasingly conducting various experiments, and individuals, who must navigate the choices presented to them. The very concept of humanity is under threat as biotechnology reshapes and transforms not only this perception but also the understanding of one’s place in the world. The absence of ethical principles and criteria for assessing the work of scientists implementing biotechnology raises further concerns. This article, therefore, focused on the position of modern individuals as consumers of biotechnology who find themselves at a crossroads. Despite the benefits offered by biotechnology, it also entails a range of risks and uncertainties regarding the future of human existence. The practical significance of this study lies in encouraging consumers to make informed choices and use biotechnology responsibly while also fostering an open dialogue among scientists. The research itself remains open to discussion, aiming to unite the efforts of scientists, public figures, and consumers

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanitarian studios pedagogics psychology philosophy
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/1.2025.98
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Biotechnology and Related Fields
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The human as consumer of biotechnology: Risks and prospects of the technological boom

Ruslan Grechkosii
2 citations
Humanitarian studios pedagogics psychology philosophy
Biotechnology and Related Fields
3.76
article

The human as consumer of biotechnology: Risks and prospects of the technological boom

Ruslan Grechkosii
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The relevance of this article was driven by the need to identify the risks faced by humans as consumers of biotechnology. Enthralled by its possibilities, consumers often overlook how the resulting changes may impact their lives. The study aimed to explore the ambiguities associated with using biotechnology in contemporary society. To achieve this, phenomenological, interpretative, and analytical methods were employed. The findings confirmed that modern advancements offer boundless opportunities – in medicine (such as artificial organ creation and life extension), energy (including biofuel production and environmental remediation), and genetic modification (of both humans and animals). However, these advancements also pose immense challenges, demanding a high level of responsibility from both scientists, who are increasingly conducting various experiments, and individuals, who must navigate the choices presented to them. The very concept of humanity is under threat as biotechnology reshapes and transforms not only this perception but also the understanding of one’s place in the world. The absence of ethical principles and criteria for assessing the work of scientists implementing biotechnology raises further concerns. This article, therefore, focused on the position of modern individuals as consumers of biotechnology who find themselves at a crossroads. Despite the benefits offered by biotechnology, it also entails a range of risks and uncertainties regarding the future of human existence. The practical significance of this study lies in encouraging consumers to make informed choices and use biotechnology responsibly while also fostering an open dialogue among scientists. The research itself remains open to discussion, aiming to unite the efforts of scientists, public figures, and consumers

Humanitarian studios pedagogics psychology philosophy
Dragomanov Ukrainian State University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Biotechnology and Related Fields
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.