Usefulness of Isosurface Geometric Measurement on Volume‐Rendered Images for Quantitative Measurements of Complex Cardiac Anatomical Features

Background: Measuring living heart anatomy using three‐dimensional (3D) images remains challenging. To address this, a method called isosurface measurement on volume‐rendered images (IMVR) has been developed. This study aims to validate IMVR in quantitative measurement by comparing it with curved planar reformation (CPR). Methods: Five 3D‐printed human cardiac models created from computed tomography (CT) images were optically scanned, and selected features were measured for reference. The models were CT‐scanned, and the datasets were processed for IMVR and CPR measurements. Overall, 157 anatomical features (105 in the aortic root, 52 in the coronary artery) were measured three times by two observers for each method, and the agreement with the reference values was assessed using the Bland–Altman analysis. Results: In the aortic root measurement, the lower and upper 95% limits of agreement (LOAs, mm) for IMVR were (−3.1, 2.4) and (−1.3, 0.9), whereas those for CPR were (−5.9, 5.2) and (−5.9, 6.3). In the coronary artery measurement, the LOAs for IMVR were (−2.6, 2.2) and (−1.2, 0.8), while those for CPR were (−9.2, 8.6) and (−9.5, 8.5). For both methods, the intraclass coefficient indicated high intra‐ and interobserver reliability. Conclusion: IMVR demonstrated greater precision than CPR and facilitated 3D measurements of complex cardiovascular features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/jocs/5193639
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Usefulness of Isosurface Geometric Measurement on Volume‐Rendered Images for Quantitative Measurements of Complex Cardiac Anatomical Features

Kenichi Kamiya, Ryo Uemura, Tomoaki Suzuki, Susumu Nakata et al.
2 citations
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
1.35
article

Usefulness of Isosurface Geometric Measurement on Volume‐Rendered Images for Quantitative Measurements of Complex Cardiac Anatomical Features

Kenichi Kamiya, Ryo Uemura, Tomoaki Suzuki, Susumu Nakata, Jun Matsubayashi, Piers Vigers, Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Tatsuya Oki, Yuji Matsubayashi, Yukihiro Nagatani, Shinya Terada
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background: Measuring living heart anatomy using three‐dimensional (3D) images remains challenging. To address this, a method called isosurface measurement on volume‐rendered images (IMVR) has been developed. This study aims to validate IMVR in quantitative measurement by comparing it with curved planar reformation (CPR). Methods: Five 3D‐printed human cardiac models created from computed tomography (CT) images were optically scanned, and selected features were measured for reference. The models were CT‐scanned, and the datasets were processed for IMVR and CPR measurements. Overall, 157 anatomical features (105 in the aortic root, 52 in the coronary artery) were measured three times by two observers for each method, and the agreement with the reference values was assessed using the Bland–Altman analysis. Results: In the aortic root measurement, the lower and upper 95% limits of agreement (LOAs, mm) for IMVR were (−3.1, 2.4) and (−1.3, 0.9), whereas those for CPR were (−5.9, 5.2) and (−5.9, 6.3). In the coronary artery measurement, the LOAs for IMVR were (−2.6, 2.2) and (−1.2, 0.8), while those for CPR were (−9.2, 8.6) and (−9.5, 8.5). For both methods, the intraclass coefficient indicated high intra‐ and interobserver reliability. Conclusion: IMVR demonstrated greater precision than CPR and facilitated 3D measurements of complex cardiovascular features.

Journal of Cardiac SurgeryVol. 2025(1)
Ritsumeikan University (JP), Shiga University of Medical Science (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.