A comparative study into the emotional impact of peer feedback modalities in ELT

The study presented herein situates and examines the face-to-face and digital modes of peer feedback regarding emotional and pedagogical effects within the ELT context. Based on a convergent mixed-methods design, this study combines quantitative data obtained from surveys about emotional responses and qualitative perspectives gained through focus group discussions, the researcher’s field notes, and the individual reflective thoughts of the participants. This study was conducted with 115 undergraduate ELT students who were divided into two groups, one to be given immediate face-to-face feedback and the other to receive asynchronous digital feedback through Google Forms. The quantitative results revealed that there is a difference in emotional responses. Face-to-face feedback provided higher scores of enthusiasm; however, anxiety-related emotions were also found to increase as compared to the digital setting. Qualitative data emphasized the advantages of immediacy and interpersonal dynamics in face-to-face feedback, while digital feedback had its own merits regarding the reflective nature and reduced stress. The integration of findings shows that hybrid models of feedback, which combine the strengths of both modalities, might enhance emotional engagement and improve learning outcomes in ELT settings. These findings add to the increasing literature on feedback practices and support the emotionally responsive and pedagogically valid feedback strategies in language education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v8n2.102504
Primary Topic
Reflective Practices in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study into the emotional impact of peer feedback modalities in ELT

Ayça Aslan
Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Reflective Practices in Education
article

A comparative study into the emotional impact of peer feedback modalities in ELT

Ayça Aslan
article en

Abstract

The study presented herein situates and examines the face-to-face and digital modes of peer feedback regarding emotional and pedagogical effects within the ELT context. Based on a convergent mixed-methods design, this study combines quantitative data obtained from surveys about emotional responses and qualitative perspectives gained through focus group discussions, the researcher’s field notes, and the individual reflective thoughts of the participants. This study was conducted with 115 undergraduate ELT students who were divided into two groups, one to be given immediate face-to-face feedback and the other to receive asynchronous digital feedback through Google Forms. The quantitative results revealed that there is a difference in emotional responses. Face-to-face feedback provided higher scores of enthusiasm; however, anxiety-related emotions were also found to increase as compared to the digital setting. Qualitative data emphasized the advantages of immediacy and interpersonal dynamics in face-to-face feedback, while digital feedback had its own merits regarding the reflective nature and reduced stress. The integration of findings shows that hybrid models of feedback, which combine the strengths of both modalities, might enhance emotional engagement and improve learning outcomes in ELT settings. These findings add to the increasing literature on feedback practices and support the emotionally responsive and pedagogically valid feedback strategies in language education.

Australian Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 8(2)
Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Reflective Practices in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.