Beyond the individual-company: from corporate social responsibilities to corporate social liability

Private law, into which company law is assimilated, follows two basic models of liability: individual liability, which is the priority model, and organisational liability, which applies in special circumstances. Yet neither of these models map directly on to the fragmented or ‘networked’ structure of transnational value chains. The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive demonstrates this point. EU legislators attempted to translate the organisationally framed responsibilities set out in the UNGPs into a private law framework. However, in doing so, they reverted to individual liability, the hallmark of national company law, due to, we believe the lack of a clear justification for making individual companies responsible for their value chain. We argue that addressing the issues raised by transnational value chains requires going beyond this dichotomy and developing a network liability model from within interpersonal law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transnational Legal Theory
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2025.2479318
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the individual-company: from corporate social responsibilities to corporate social liability

John G. Quinn, Rónán Condon
1 citations
Transnational Legal Theory
Corporate Law and Human Rights
2.76
article

Beyond the individual-company: from corporate social responsibilities to corporate social liability

John G. Quinn, Rónán Condon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Private law, into which company law is assimilated, follows two basic models of liability: individual liability, which is the priority model, and organisational liability, which applies in special circumstances. Yet neither of these models map directly on to the fragmented or ‘networked’ structure of transnational value chains. The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive demonstrates this point. EU legislators attempted to translate the organisationally framed responsibilities set out in the UNGPs into a private law framework. However, in doing so, they reverted to individual liability, the hallmark of national company law, due to, we believe the lack of a clear justification for making individual companies responsible for their value chain. We argue that addressing the issues raised by transnational value chains requires going beyond this dichotomy and developing a network liability model from within interpersonal law.

Transnational Legal TheoryVol. 16(1-2)
Dublin City University (IE)
Royal Irish Academy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.