The Uncounted Dead: Statist Bias and Civilian Targeting in Conflict Data

Abstract Quantitative research on violence against civilians relies extensively on “off-the-shelf” data, such as the widely cited Uppsala Conflict Data Program's (UCDP) One-Sided Violence dataset. We show that, due to data collection and coding protocols that privilege government narratives of violence, such data often reproduces statist biases pervasive in the international system. These dynamics are particularly visible when civilian deaths result from airstrikes, shelling, and other forms of long-range bombardment. Such capabilities are disproportionately possessed by states, yet conservative coding practices, combined with government control over information and access restrictions, dictate that UCDP consistently codes civilian deaths at the hands of governments as “battle-related” or incidental rather than deliberate targeting. We analyze patterns in the UCDP data release, version 23.1, using evidence from Sri Lanka and Ethiopia to illustrate these patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Security Studies
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf013
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Uncounted Dead: Statist Bias and Civilian Targeting in Conflict Data

Kate Cronin-Furman, Milli Lake, Michael Broache, Agnes Yu
Journal of Global Security Studies
Political Conflict and Governance
article

The Uncounted Dead: Statist Bias and Civilian Targeting in Conflict Data

Kate Cronin-Furman, Milli Lake, Michael Broache, Agnes Yu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Quantitative research on violence against civilians relies extensively on “off-the-shelf” data, such as the widely cited Uppsala Conflict Data Program's (UCDP) One-Sided Violence dataset. We show that, due to data collection and coding protocols that privilege government narratives of violence, such data often reproduces statist biases pervasive in the international system. These dynamics are particularly visible when civilian deaths result from airstrikes, shelling, and other forms of long-range bombardment. Such capabilities are disproportionately possessed by states, yet conservative coding practices, combined with government control over information and access restrictions, dictate that UCDP consistently codes civilian deaths at the hands of governments as “battle-related” or incidental rather than deliberate targeting. We analyze patterns in the UCDP data release, version 23.1, using evidence from Sri Lanka and Ethiopia to illustrate these patterns.

Journal of Global Security StudiesVol. 10(3)
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), University College London (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.