Incongruence Between Prerequisite Molecular Testing and Treatment with Personalized Therapies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Study

Personalized medicine, including targeted and immunotherapy, has substantially changed the landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). About 30% of NSCLC tumors have targetable mutations, like EGFR, and 28% of tumors will have a PD-L1 score or tumor mutation burden high enough to warrant immunotherapy; a molecular test prior to therapy assesses eligibility. However, the congruence between testing and treatment, and the effect of treatment without testing on outcomes, is understudied. We extracted a cohort of NSCLC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked data. The primary outcome was survival. Demographic and clinical characteristics of those receiving vs. not receiving a molecular test were compared, and a Kaplan-Meier curve along with a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression assessed the association of survival with the receipt of molecular diagnostic testing, adjusting for sex, race, age, income tract, metro/urban/rural region, histology, and stage. There were 911 NSCLC patients treated with personalized therapy, of which 513 (56.3%) had received prior molecular testing. Black patients were less likely than White patients to receive testing (36.4% vs. 59.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Testing was significantly more frequent in patients with fewer comorbidities (<i>p</i> < 0.001), adenocarcinoma (<i>p</i> = 0.004), tumors in the lower lobe (<i>p</i> = 0.037), or diagnosed at a later stage (<i>p</i> = 0.026). Only 39.9% of patients receiving EGFR inhibitors were initially tested for an EGFR mutation. Among NSCLC patients treated with personalized therapy, untested patients were at increased mortality risk compared to tested patients (median survival 8.22 vs. 12.79 months, <i>p</i> = 0.024). After adjustment, treated patients not tested beforehand had a significantly higher mortality risk (HRadj: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04-1.40). Substantial incongruence between receipt of molecular testing and personalized therapies exists according to nationwide claims data, with only about half of treated patients having had an appropriate molecular diagnostic workup. This could explain, in part, the higher mortality among treated patients who did not undergo testing. Before expanding personalized therapies, further addressing these issues through standardized, reflexive testing protocols and improved clinician education is critical to optimizing the integration of molecular diagnostics into treatment planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104581
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incongruence Between Prerequisite Molecular Testing and Treatment with Personalized Therapies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Study

Stephanie Tuminello, Emanuela Taioli, Raja M. Flores, Matthew Untalan et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
3.04
article

Incongruence Between Prerequisite Molecular Testing and Treatment with Personalized Therapies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Study

Stephanie Tuminello, Emanuela Taioli, Raja M. Flores, Matthew Untalan, Wiley M Turner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Personalized medicine, including targeted and immunotherapy, has substantially changed the landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). About 30% of NSCLC tumors have targetable mutations, like EGFR, and 28% of tumors will have a PD-L1 score or tumor mutation burden high enough to warrant immunotherapy; a molecular test prior to therapy assesses eligibility. However, the congruence between testing and treatment, and the effect of treatment without testing on outcomes, is understudied. We extracted a cohort of NSCLC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked data. The primary outcome was survival. Demographic and clinical characteristics of those receiving vs. not receiving a molecular test were compared, and a Kaplan-Meier curve along with a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression assessed the association of survival with the receipt of molecular diagnostic testing, adjusting for sex, race, age, income tract, metro/urban/rural region, histology, and stage. There were 911 NSCLC patients treated with personalized therapy, of which 513 (56.3%) had received prior molecular testing. Black patients were less likely than White patients to receive testing (36.4% vs. 59.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Testing was significantly more frequent in patients with fewer comorbidities (<i>p</i> < 0.001), adenocarcinoma (<i>p</i> = 0.004), tumors in the lower lobe (<i>p</i> = 0.037), or diagnosed at a later stage (<i>p</i> = 0.026). Only 39.9% of patients receiving EGFR inhibitors were initially tested for an EGFR mutation. Among NSCLC patients treated with personalized therapy, untested patients were at increased mortality risk compared to tested patients (median survival 8.22 vs. 12.79 months, <i>p</i> = 0.024). After adjustment, treated patients not tested beforehand had a significantly higher mortality risk (HRadj: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04-1.40). Substantial incongruence between receipt of molecular testing and personalized therapies exists according to nationwide claims data, with only about half of treated patients having had an appropriate molecular diagnostic workup. This could explain, in part, the higher mortality among treated patients who did not undergo testing. Before expanding personalized therapies, further addressing these issues through standardized, reflexive testing protocols and improved clinician education is critical to optimizing the integration of molecular diagnostics into treatment planning.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 26(10)
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
California Department of Public Health, University of Southern California, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, University of California, San Francisco, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.