Does Descriptive Representation of Women on the Bench Improve Institutional Trust?

Abstract An often-used normative argument for increasing judicial diversity is that it will enhance public confidence in courts. This paper tests competing perspectives about whether the descriptive representation of women in the federal judiciary will improve institutional trust, using a nationally representative survey experiment. The findings suggest that, in the post- Dobbs era, descriptive representation for gender on low visibility courts yields a positive effect on institutional trust, but that the magnitude of the effect is quite small, time limited, and restricted to Democrats and to those who already have higher levels of trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Courts
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2025.8
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Descriptive Representation of Women on the Bench Improve Institutional Trust?

Laura P. Moyer
Journal of Law and Courts
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Does Descriptive Representation of Women on the Bench Improve Institutional Trust?

Laura P. Moyer
article en

Abstract

Abstract An often-used normative argument for increasing judicial diversity is that it will enhance public confidence in courts. This paper tests competing perspectives about whether the descriptive representation of women in the federal judiciary will improve institutional trust, using a nationally representative survey experiment. The findings suggest that, in the post- Dobbs era, descriptive representation for gender on low visibility courts yields a positive effect on institutional trust, but that the magnitude of the effect is quite small, time limited, and restricted to Democrats and to those who already have higher levels of trust.

Journal of Law and Courts
University of Louisville (US)
University of Louisville, University of Cambridge
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.