Centralized and Decentralized Selection of Information Technology Projects in Universities

Universities undertake IT projects to meet their strategic and operational needs. However, the demand for these projects often exceeds the available funding. Consequently, universities must carefully prioritize which IT projects to pursue. To aid in this decision-making process, universities have established IT governance. IT governance at the university involves multiple committees that evaluate and approve IT initiatives within the institution.Universities are also known to make IT decisions through centralized and decentralized approaches. Centralized decisions incorporate input from various colleges or business units, ensuring a comprehensive review process. In contrast, decentralized choices are made independently by individual colleges or business units.This study delves into the specific context of IT project selection within universities. It aims to investigate how IT governance committees influence project selection and whether decisions are centralized or decentralized. This study involved an analysis of two large and two small universities in the United States of America (USA). The findings revealed that large universities exhibit decentralized IT project selection, bypassing the IT governance committee structure when funds are available. In contrast, small universities tend to demonstrate centralized decision-making by submitting IT project requests to IT governance committees. Overall, this research sheds light on the complexities of IT project selection in centralized and decentralized settings and emphasizes the importance of effective governance structures in guiding decision-making processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of business and management invention.
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35629/8028-14044250
Primary Topic
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Centralized and Decentralized Selection of Information Technology Projects in Universities

Sam Ghosh
International journal of business and management invention.
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
article

Centralized and Decentralized Selection of Information Technology Projects in Universities

Sam Ghosh
article en

Abstract

Universities undertake IT projects to meet their strategic and operational needs. However, the demand for these projects often exceeds the available funding. Consequently, universities must carefully prioritize which IT projects to pursue. To aid in this decision-making process, universities have established IT governance. IT governance at the university involves multiple committees that evaluate and approve IT initiatives within the institution.Universities are also known to make IT decisions through centralized and decentralized approaches. Centralized decisions incorporate input from various colleges or business units, ensuring a comprehensive review process. In contrast, decentralized choices are made independently by individual colleges or business units.This study delves into the specific context of IT project selection within universities. It aims to investigate how IT governance committees influence project selection and whether decisions are centralized or decentralized. This study involved an analysis of two large and two small universities in the United States of America (USA). The findings revealed that large universities exhibit decentralized IT project selection, bypassing the IT governance committee structure when funds are available. In contrast, small universities tend to demonstrate centralized decision-making by submitting IT project requests to IT governance committees. Overall, this research sheds light on the complexities of IT project selection in centralized and decentralized settings and emphasizes the importance of effective governance structures in guiding decision-making processes.

International journal of business and management invention.Vol. 14(4)
Ministry of the Interior and Administrative Reconstruction (GR), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.