Preventable Risk Factors: Retrospective Analysis of a Cohort of 21 Cases of Cervical Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

Objective: In 2020 we had reported that with non-invasive integrative management, 20 out of 21 cases of Low-grade Intraepithelial Squamous Lesions (LSIL) of cervix responded, whilst one case discontinued early. Subsequent to the analysis by Global Collaborative Group on Cancer Risk Factors in 2022, we report retrospective analysis of Preventable Risk Factors (PRFs) in this cohort. Materials and Methods: We graded each PRF from 0 to 3 scores as per the severity with grade 0=no risk, 1=minor risk, 2= moderate risk and 3= definite risk. Sixteen PRFs for cervical cancer were scored in all cases into 4 grades. The treated 20 cases were classified in 3 groups according to Pap smear changes- Group 1: persistent LSIL/non-responders (n=2); Group 2: regression to Atypia (n=9); Group 3: responders/regression to negative smears (n=9). Results: Single or multiple PRFs, other than LSIL in Pap smear at enrolment, were present in every case. Some common PRFs in this cohort were cervico-vaginal infection (21/21), overweight/obesity (11/21), Unhealthy diet (3/21), raised serum IL-6 (3/21) etc. The mean±SD total risk score after grading in Group 1 was 14.5±3.53 vs 10.44±4.66 in Group 2 vs 10.62±1.22 in Group 3. Mann Whitney U test: p value = 0.051 indicated a nonsignificant trend towards higher risk scores in Group 1 vs Group 3. Conclusion: All LSIL cases had single or multiple risk factors at initial examination. The total scores of graded PRFs were slightly higher in the persistent LSIL group than in treatment responders, just short of statistical significance. It may be difficult to screen and advise all women to reduce PRFs due to unmanageable numbers. Therefore, at least all screen positive cases should be advised on possible consequences of PRFs. Downgrading PRFs may reduce recurrences and progression to invasive cancer. Some PRFs are common to other cancers and non-communicable diseases hence there are multiple health benefits of such a policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcb.2025.10.2.501-505
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preventable Risk Factors: Retrospective Analysis of a Cohort of 21 Cases of Cervical Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

Prajakta Paradkar Hemant, Joshi Jayashree Vinay, Rastogi Neerja Harishchandra, Walwatkar Priya Jayant et al.
1 citations
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
1.35
article

Preventable Risk Factors: Retrospective Analysis of a Cohort of 21 Cases of Cervical Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

Prajakta Paradkar Hemant, Joshi Jayashree Vinay, Rastogi Neerja Harishchandra, Walwatkar Priya Jayant, Jagtap Sujata Shrikant
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: In 2020 we had reported that with non-invasive integrative management, 20 out of 21 cases of Low-grade Intraepithelial Squamous Lesions (LSIL) of cervix responded, whilst one case discontinued early. Subsequent to the analysis by Global Collaborative Group on Cancer Risk Factors in 2022, we report retrospective analysis of Preventable Risk Factors (PRFs) in this cohort. Materials and Methods: We graded each PRF from 0 to 3 scores as per the severity with grade 0=no risk, 1=minor risk, 2= moderate risk and 3= definite risk. Sixteen PRFs for cervical cancer were scored in all cases into 4 grades. The treated 20 cases were classified in 3 groups according to Pap smear changes- Group 1: persistent LSIL/non-responders (n=2); Group 2: regression to Atypia (n=9); Group 3: responders/regression to negative smears (n=9). Results: Single or multiple PRFs, other than LSIL in Pap smear at enrolment, were present in every case. Some common PRFs in this cohort were cervico-vaginal infection (21/21), overweight/obesity (11/21), Unhealthy diet (3/21), raised serum IL-6 (3/21) etc. The mean±SD total risk score after grading in Group 1 was 14.5±3.53 vs 10.44±4.66 in Group 2 vs 10.62±1.22 in Group 3. Mann Whitney U test: p value = 0.051 indicated a nonsignificant trend towards higher risk scores in Group 1 vs Group 3. Conclusion: All LSIL cases had single or multiple risk factors at initial examination. The total scores of graded PRFs were slightly higher in the persistent LSIL group than in treatment responders, just short of statistical significance. It may be difficult to screen and advise all women to reduce PRFs due to unmanageable numbers. Therefore, at least all screen positive cases should be advised on possible consequences of PRFs. Downgrading PRFs may reduce recurrences and progression to invasive cancer. Some PRFs are common to other cancers and non-communicable diseases hence there are multiple health benefits of such a policy.

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer BiologyVol. 10(2)
Podar Ayurved Medical College (IN), Kasturba Hospital (IN)
Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.