NETOCRATISATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: INFORMATION SOCIETY TRENDS

The article examines the phenomenon of netocracy as a new model of publicadministration organization in the context of the emergence of an information society.Netocracy is considered not simply as a consequence of digitalization, but as aqualitatively new logic of power based on network interaction, strategic communications,information flows, and reputational capital.The study analyzes key trends that contribute to the outlined transformation: thegrowth of the role of digital elites, algorithmization of management, participation,crowdsourcing, digital activism, and rethinking legitimacy in the digital age. Particularattention is paid to the transformation of the institutional architecture of publicadministration (from a centralized bureaucratic model to a dynamic network ecosystemin which the state acts not as a controller, but as a facilitator and moderator of publicinteraction).Key challenges and risks in public administration related to netocracy areidentified: the crisis of legitimacy of traditional institutions, dependence on global ITstructures, digital inequality, threats of fragmentation of public space and algorithmicpopulism. The need to form new legal, ethical and managerial mechanisms capable ofensuring a balance between technological innovation and democratic accountability isemphasized.The positive impact of netocracy is emphasized, which consists in forming uniqueopportunities – not only to adapt to the digital age, but also to become an example ofmodern, open and sustainable network governance. References1. Eesti.ee. 2022. Retrieved from http://www.eesti.ee/et/ [in Estonian].2. UN study. Electronic government 2022. The future of digital government. Retrievedfrom https://desapublications.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/2023-02/UN%20E-Government%20Survey%202022%20-%20Russian%20Web%20Version.pdf [in Ukrainian].3. Infocomms & Technology. 2022. Retrieved from https://www.gov.sg/infocommsand-technology [in English].4. Secretariat, T.B.O.C. Way Forward. Canada.ca. Retrieved fromhttps://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digitalgovernmentstrategy/way-forward.html [in English].5. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Official web portal. Retrieved fromhttp://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/radan_gs09/ns_golos?g_id=22425 [in Ukrainian].6. Storozhenko, L. G. (2023). Netokratychni pidkhody v publichnomu upravlinni:svitovyy dosvid zastosuvannya [Netocratic approaches in public administration:world experience of application]. Naukovi perspektyvy – Scientific Perspectives,5(35), 275–287 [in Ukrainian].7. Diia. Retrieved from https://diia.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].

Publication Details

Journal
Public management and digital practices
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31673/2786-7412.2025.015423
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NETOCRATISATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: INFORMATION SOCIETY TRENDS

1 citations
Public management and digital practices
Corruption and Economic Development
4.20
article

NETOCRATISATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: INFORMATION SOCIETY TRENDS

article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article examines the phenomenon of netocracy as a new model of publicadministration organization in the context of the emergence of an information society.Netocracy is considered not simply as a consequence of digitalization, but as aqualitatively new logic of power based on network interaction, strategic communications,information flows, and reputational capital.The study analyzes key trends that contribute to the outlined transformation: thegrowth of the role of digital elites, algorithmization of management, participation,crowdsourcing, digital activism, and rethinking legitimacy in the digital age. Particularattention is paid to the transformation of the institutional architecture of publicadministration (from a centralized bureaucratic model to a dynamic network ecosystemin which the state acts not as a controller, but as a facilitator and moderator of publicinteraction).Key challenges and risks in public administration related to netocracy areidentified: the crisis of legitimacy of traditional institutions, dependence on global ITstructures, digital inequality, threats of fragmentation of public space and algorithmicpopulism. The need to form new legal, ethical and managerial mechanisms capable ofensuring a balance between technological innovation and democratic accountability isemphasized.The positive impact of netocracy is emphasized, which consists in forming uniqueopportunities – not only to adapt to the digital age, but also to become an example ofmodern, open and sustainable network governance. References1. Eesti.ee. 2022. Retrieved from http://www.eesti.ee/et/ [in Estonian].2. UN study. Electronic government 2022. The future of digital government. Retrievedfrom https://desapublications.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/2023-02/UN%20E-Government%20Survey%202022%20-%20Russian%20Web%20Version.pdf [in Ukrainian].3. Infocomms & Technology. 2022. Retrieved from https://www.gov.sg/infocommsand-technology [in English].4. Secretariat, T.B.O.C. Way Forward. Canada.ca. Retrieved fromhttps://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digitalgovernmentstrategy/way-forward.html [in English].5. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Official web portal. Retrieved fromhttp://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/radan_gs09/ns_golos?g_id=22425 [in Ukrainian].6. Storozhenko, L. G. (2023). Netokratychni pidkhody v publichnomu upravlinni:svitovyy dosvid zastosuvannya [Netocratic approaches in public administration:world experience of application]. Naukovi perspektyvy – Scientific Perspectives,5(35), 275–287 [in Ukrainian].7. Diia. Retrieved from https://diia.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].

Public management and digital practicesVol. 4(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corruption and Economic Development
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.