Minimizing the Risk of Biological Specimen Mix-Up in the Mammography Unit: A Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Methodology in Oncology Setting

Background: Effective cancer management relies heavily on early diagnosis, which significantly improves patient outcomes by enabling timely and accurate treatment decisions. Despite advancements in diagnostic tools, the risk of specimen mix-ups remains a critical challenge, particularly in the pre-analytic phase of specimen collection.Purpose: This study aimed to minimize the risk of biological specimen mix-ups in the mammography unit in Oncology center through the implementation of the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) methodology. Methods: A proactive FMEA was conducted in the mammography unit, targeting the pre-analytic phase of specimen collection. A multidisciplinary team identified potential failure modes, assessed their severity, occurrence, and detection, and calculated the Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs). Interventions were developed and implemented to address high-risk areas, with post-intervention RPNs evaluated to measure the effectiveness of the changes. Results: The analysis revealed high-risk failure modes, including patient misidentification, labeling errors, and inadequate specimen tracking, with initial RPNs ranging from 280 to 360. Interventions such as standardizing patient identification, improving consent processes, and enhancing specimen labeling systems led to significant RPN reductions across all categories, with the most notable improvement observed in site marking (67% reduction). Conclusion: The proactive use of FMEA effectively identified, mitigated the risks, and enhanced the safety and reliability of specimen collection in the mammography unit. This approach highlights the importance of applying systematic risk management processes in improving diagnostic accuracy and patient safety, providing a model for other healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcb.2025.10.2.277-284
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimizing the Risk of Biological Specimen Mix-Up in the Mammography Unit: A Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Methodology in Oncology Setting

Zaid Al-Ishaq, Raed Shatnawi, Omar Ayaad, Khalid Al-Baimani et al.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Minimizing the Risk of Biological Specimen Mix-Up in the Mammography Unit: A Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Methodology in Oncology Setting

Zaid Al-Ishaq, Raed Shatnawi, Omar Ayaad, Khalid Al-Baimani, Rashid Al-Sukaiti, Ayman Omar, Eyad Abu Alhaijaa, Huda Al‐Awaisi, Rawan Ibrahim, Adil Al-Ajmi, Mohamad Majed, Shima Alajmi, Fatma Al Dhabbari, Badriya Al Qassabi, Nasr Ali Salim Al Riyami
article en

Abstract

Background: Effective cancer management relies heavily on early diagnosis, which significantly improves patient outcomes by enabling timely and accurate treatment decisions. Despite advancements in diagnostic tools, the risk of specimen mix-ups remains a critical challenge, particularly in the pre-analytic phase of specimen collection.Purpose: This study aimed to minimize the risk of biological specimen mix-ups in the mammography unit in Oncology center through the implementation of the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) methodology. Methods: A proactive FMEA was conducted in the mammography unit, targeting the pre-analytic phase of specimen collection. A multidisciplinary team identified potential failure modes, assessed their severity, occurrence, and detection, and calculated the Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs). Interventions were developed and implemented to address high-risk areas, with post-intervention RPNs evaluated to measure the effectiveness of the changes. Results: The analysis revealed high-risk failure modes, including patient misidentification, labeling errors, and inadequate specimen tracking, with initial RPNs ranging from 280 to 360. Interventions such as standardizing patient identification, improving consent processes, and enhancing specimen labeling systems led to significant RPN reductions across all categories, with the most notable improvement observed in site marking (67% reduction). Conclusion: The proactive use of FMEA effectively identified, mitigated the risks, and enhanced the safety and reliability of specimen collection in the mammography unit. This approach highlights the importance of applying systematic risk management processes in improving diagnostic accuracy and patient safety, providing a model for other healthcare settings.

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer BiologyVol. 10(2)
Hashemite University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.