Measurement of the Development Level, Spatiotemporal Evolution and Coordinated Development of China’s New Quality Productive Forces

本文基于新质生产力内涵及已有相关理论,构建了中国新质生产力水平评价指标体系,并对新质生产力空间差异和演变规律进行剖析,从而真实反映其实际发展状况。研究发现:自党的十八大以来,中国新质生产力水平呈现上升态势。然而,不同地区之间的差异显著,既体现在四大区域板块的梯度差距上,也表现为少数省市的新质生产力水平显著高于其他省份,而大多数省份则相对较低。为此,应积极推进新质生产力的发展,培养新兴技术人才,倡议建设多样化的区域创新联盟,集中攻克前沿产业和未来产业中的关键技术,不断推动专利成果的商业化;防范新兴产业领域的投资过热现象,科学控制和适当释放区域性新质生产力的集聚效应、回波效应和扩散效应;确保中低发展水平地区的新质生产力提升,避免陷入中高发展水平地区的瓶颈,并确保高水平地区在新质生产力方面的领先地位,这是实现中国新型生产力全面协调发展的重要路径。Based on the connotation of new quality productivity and existing relevant theories, this article constructs an evaluation index system for the level of new quality productivity in China, and analyzes the spatial differences and evolution laws of new quality productivity, in order to truly reflect its actual development status. Research has found that since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the level of new quality productivity in China has shown an upward trend. However, there are significant differences between different regions, reflected not only in the gradient differences of the four major regional plates, but also in the fact that a few provinces and cities have significantly higher levels of new quality productivity than other provinces, while most provinces have relatively lower levels. To this end, we should actively promote the development of new quality productive forces, cultivate emerging technological talents, advocate the construction of diversified regional innovation alliances, focus on tackling key technologies in cutting-edge and future industries, and continuously promote the commercialization of patent achievements; Prevent investment overheating in emerging industries, scientifically control and appropriately release the agglomeration effect, echo effect and diffusion effect of regional new quality productivity; Ensuring the improvement of new quality productivity in areas with medium to low development levels, avoiding bottlenecks in areas with medium to high development levels, and ensuring the leading position of high-level areas in new quality productivity are important paths to achieving comprehensive and coordinated development of China’s new productivity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science and Engineering
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12677/mse.2025.143062
Primary Topic
Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement of the Development Level, Spatiotemporal Evolution and Coordinated Development of China’s New Quality Productive Forces

凯 宋
Management Science and Engineering
Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis
article

Measurement of the Development Level, Spatiotemporal Evolution and Coordinated Development of China’s New Quality Productive Forces

凯 宋
article en

Abstract

本文基于新质生产力内涵及已有相关理论,构建了中国新质生产力水平评价指标体系,并对新质生产力空间差异和演变规律进行剖析,从而真实反映其实际发展状况。研究发现:自党的十八大以来,中国新质生产力水平呈现上升态势。然而,不同地区之间的差异显著,既体现在四大区域板块的梯度差距上,也表现为少数省市的新质生产力水平显著高于其他省份,而大多数省份则相对较低。为此,应积极推进新质生产力的发展,培养新兴技术人才,倡议建设多样化的区域创新联盟,集中攻克前沿产业和未来产业中的关键技术,不断推动专利成果的商业化;防范新兴产业领域的投资过热现象,科学控制和适当释放区域性新质生产力的集聚效应、回波效应和扩散效应;确保中低发展水平地区的新质生产力提升,避免陷入中高发展水平地区的瓶颈,并确保高水平地区在新质生产力方面的领先地位,这是实现中国新型生产力全面协调发展的重要路径。Based on the connotation of new quality productivity and existing relevant theories, this article constructs an evaluation index system for the level of new quality productivity in China, and analyzes the spatial differences and evolution laws of new quality productivity, in order to truly reflect its actual development status. Research has found that since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the level of new quality productivity in China has shown an upward trend. However, there are significant differences between different regions, reflected not only in the gradient differences of the four major regional plates, but also in the fact that a few provinces and cities have significantly higher levels of new quality productivity than other provinces, while most provinces have relatively lower levels. To this end, we should actively promote the development of new quality productive forces, cultivate emerging technological talents, advocate the construction of diversified regional innovation alliances, focus on tackling key technologies in cutting-edge and future industries, and continuously promote the commercialization of patent achievements; Prevent investment overheating in emerging industries, scientifically control and appropriately release the agglomeration effect, echo effect and diffusion effect of regional new quality productivity; Ensuring the improvement of new quality productivity in areas with medium to low development levels, avoiding bottlenecks in areas with medium to high development levels, and ensuring the leading position of high-level areas in new quality productivity are important paths to achieving comprehensive and coordinated development of China’s new productivity.

Management Science and EngineeringVol. 14(03)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.