Smartphone-Based Audiometric Test Results on Different Mobile Phones: A Cross-Sectional Study

Objective: Mobile hearing test applications allow users to assess their hearing thresholds directly on their personal phones. While numerous studies have evaluated the validity and reliability of these applications, the impact of different mobile phones on test results has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aims to investigate how mobile hearing test results vary based on the mobile phone used. Material and Methods: Air conduction hearing thresholds of 78 participants with normal hearing, aged 18-25 years (20.961.13) were determined with Hearing Test (e-audiologia.pl) and uHear applications in a quiet environment (<30 dBA), on both Android and iOS-based reference phones, as well as the participants' personal mobile phones. The results of the applications on the reference phone and the participants' phones and the results of both applications on the reference phone were compared. Results: The Hearing Test (e-audiologia.pl) thresholds were significantly lower than the uHear at all frequencies bilaterally (p<0.05). 4000-6000 Hz in the right ear and 1000, 4000, and 6000 Hz in the left ear thresholds in the Hearing Test (e-audiologia.pl) were significantly better on the reference phone (p<0.05). Also, in the uHear, hearing thresholds were significantly better on the reference phone at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz bilaterally and on the participants' phones at 4000 Hz in the left ear (p<0.05). Conclusion: Mobile hearing test applications may yield varying results across different mobile phones. Manufacturers and researchers should account for these device-related variations when designing and evaluating such tests.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5336/healthsci.2024-105957
Primary Topic
Speech and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smartphone-Based Audiometric Test Results on Different Mobile Phones: A Cross-Sectional Study

Özge Gedik Toker, Elif Kuru, Nidanur Çelik, Zeynep Bozali
Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health Sciences
Speech and Audio Processing
article

Smartphone-Based Audiometric Test Results on Different Mobile Phones: A Cross-Sectional Study

Özge Gedik Toker, Elif Kuru, Nidanur Çelik, Zeynep Bozali
article en

Abstract

Objective: Mobile hearing test applications allow users to assess their hearing thresholds directly on their personal phones. While numerous studies have evaluated the validity and reliability of these applications, the impact of different mobile phones on test results has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aims to investigate how mobile hearing test results vary based on the mobile phone used. Material and Methods: Air conduction hearing thresholds of 78 participants with normal hearing, aged 18-25 years (20.961.13) were determined with Hearing Test (e-audiologia.pl) and uHear applications in a quiet environment (<30 dBA), on both Android and iOS-based reference phones, as well as the participants' personal mobile phones. The results of the applications on the reference phone and the participants' phones and the results of both applications on the reference phone were compared. Results: The Hearing Test (e-audiologia.pl) thresholds were significantly lower than the uHear at all frequencies bilaterally (p<0.05). 4000-6000 Hz in the right ear and 1000, 4000, and 6000 Hz in the left ear thresholds in the Hearing Test (e-audiologia.pl) were significantly better on the reference phone (p<0.05). Also, in the uHear, hearing thresholds were significantly better on the reference phone at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz bilaterally and on the participants' phones at 4000 Hz in the left ear (p<0.05). Conclusion: Mobile hearing test applications may yield varying results across different mobile phones. Manufacturers and researchers should account for these device-related variations when designing and evaluating such tests.

Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health SciencesVol. 10(2)
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Speech and Audio Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Smartphone-Based Audiometric Test Results on Different Mobile Phones: A Cross-Sectional Study — Özge Gedik Toker, Elif Kuru, et al. · Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS