Assessment of Direct RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Multiplexed Assay

Abstract RNA extraction is usually required for molecular detection methods. On the other hand, this step implies time consumption and additional cost to laboratorial routine. This study evaluated the use of direct-RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection compared to the gold standard extraction method. An exploratory stage was performed using DMSO, glycerol, Tween 20 and Easy Extract® DNA-RNA addition in a pool of highly positive clinical samples (CT<25), which were subsequently tested by AllplexTM 2019-nCoV assay. Validation was performed with 54 SARS-CoV-2 positive and five negative clinical samples comparing three distinct conditions: (i) 1:1 water dilution, (ii) 1.5% DMSO dilution, or (iii) crude samples. Results of the exploratory stage showed Cycle Threshold (CT) values very close to those obtained by the reference extraction step in high viral load samples. However, when lower viral load samples were analyzed, a slight concordance was observed compared to the extraction step. In the validation stage, it was observed that water or 1.5% DMSO dilution presented 97.3% of concordance in samples with CT≤30, resulting in 97.4% of sensitivity and 0.83 Kappa coefficient. Sensitivity was reduced with samples CT>30 and with crude samples. The methodology showed reproducibility with differents operators. These results reinforce the good performance of direct RT-qPCR methods in active SARS-CoV-2 infection, allowed cost and time reduction of diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2025240420
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Direct RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Multiplexed Assay

Rachel Cruz Alves, Renata Dezengrini Slhessarenko, Bruno Moreira Carneiro, José Henrique Francisco Roma et al.
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
article

Assessment of Direct RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Multiplexed Assay

Rachel Cruz Alves, Renata Dezengrini Slhessarenko, Bruno Moreira Carneiro, José Henrique Francisco Roma, Juliana Helena Chávez‐Pavoni
article en

Abstract

Abstract RNA extraction is usually required for molecular detection methods. On the other hand, this step implies time consumption and additional cost to laboratorial routine. This study evaluated the use of direct-RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection compared to the gold standard extraction method. An exploratory stage was performed using DMSO, glycerol, Tween 20 and Easy Extract® DNA-RNA addition in a pool of highly positive clinical samples (CT<25), which were subsequently tested by AllplexTM 2019-nCoV assay. Validation was performed with 54 SARS-CoV-2 positive and five negative clinical samples comparing three distinct conditions: (i) 1:1 water dilution, (ii) 1.5% DMSO dilution, or (iii) crude samples. Results of the exploratory stage showed Cycle Threshold (CT) values very close to those obtained by the reference extraction step in high viral load samples. However, when lower viral load samples were analyzed, a slight concordance was observed compared to the extraction step. In the validation stage, it was observed that water or 1.5% DMSO dilution presented 97.3% of concordance in samples with CT≤30, resulting in 97.4% of sensitivity and 0.83 Kappa coefficient. Sensitivity was reduced with samples CT>30 and with crude samples. The methodology showed reproducibility with differents operators. These results reinforce the good performance of direct RT-qPCR methods in active SARS-CoV-2 infection, allowed cost and time reduction of diagnosis.

Brazilian Archives of Biology and TechnologyVol. 68
Universidade Federal de Rondônia (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (BR), Universidade Federal de Rondonópolis
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.