Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery: Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Learning Curves between Novice and Experienced Surgeons

Abstract Background: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis can lead to neurological problems that may require surgical decompression. Recently, unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is a novel, minimally invasive technique that can achieve effective decompression while preserving column stability. However, novice surgeons may face challenges in the localization and manipulation of the endoscope. Objectives: We compared the outcomes of UBE surgeries between novice and experienced surgeons, evaluating its suitability for clinical practice. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 58 patients who underwent UBE decompression at our institution. Twenty-nine patients were operated on by a novice surgeon (the novice surgeon group) and the other 29 patients were operated on by an experienced surgeon (the experienced surgeon group). Data on gender, age, operative level, surgery duration, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and follow-up duration were collected. Postoperative outcomes, including pain scores, functional ability, and complications, were compared. Results: The experienced surgeon group demonstrated shorter operation duration and hospital stay compared with the novice surgeon group. Both groups experienced improvements in postoperative leg pain, whereas there is no significant difference in comparison between the two groups. Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved after surgery in both groups, and the experienced surgeon group had significantly superior scores at the 3-month (14.90 ± 6.43 vs. 21.59 ± 11.54, P < 0.05) and 6-month follow-up (11.24 ± 5.46 vs. 15.10 ± 10.96, P < 0.05). Complications were observed in 3.3% of the experienced surgeon group (1 dural tear) and in 13.8% of the novice surgeon group (4 dural tears). After plotting the learning curve by cumulative sum analysis, the surgical technique reaches a plateau after 13 cases of operation in both groups. Conclusions: UBE offers promising clinical outcomes when performed by both novice and experienced surgeons. Consequently, UBE can be considered a suitable option for surgical decompression in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, even for surgeons new to endoscopic spine surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/fjmd.fjmd-d-24-00016
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery: Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Learning Curves between Novice and Experienced Surgeons

Jwo‐Luen Pao, Yu-Hung Chen, Siwei Cheng
Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery: Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Learning Curves between Novice and Experienced Surgeons

Jwo‐Luen Pao, Yu-Hung Chen, Siwei Cheng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis can lead to neurological problems that may require surgical decompression. Recently, unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is a novel, minimally invasive technique that can achieve effective decompression while preserving column stability. However, novice surgeons may face challenges in the localization and manipulation of the endoscope. Objectives: We compared the outcomes of UBE surgeries between novice and experienced surgeons, evaluating its suitability for clinical practice. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 58 patients who underwent UBE decompression at our institution. Twenty-nine patients were operated on by a novice surgeon (the novice surgeon group) and the other 29 patients were operated on by an experienced surgeon (the experienced surgeon group). Data on gender, age, operative level, surgery duration, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and follow-up duration were collected. Postoperative outcomes, including pain scores, functional ability, and complications, were compared. Results: The experienced surgeon group demonstrated shorter operation duration and hospital stay compared with the novice surgeon group. Both groups experienced improvements in postoperative leg pain, whereas there is no significant difference in comparison between the two groups. Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved after surgery in both groups, and the experienced surgeon group had significantly superior scores at the 3-month (14.90 ± 6.43 vs. 21.59 ± 11.54, P < 0.05) and 6-month follow-up (11.24 ± 5.46 vs. 15.10 ± 10.96, P < 0.05). Complications were observed in 3.3% of the experienced surgeon group (1 dural tear) and in 13.8% of the novice surgeon group (4 dural tears). After plotting the learning curve by cumulative sum analysis, the surgical technique reaches a plateau after 13 cases of operation in both groups. Conclusions: UBE offers promising clinical outcomes when performed by both novice and experienced surgeons. Consequently, UBE can be considered a suitable option for surgical decompression in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, even for surgeons new to endoscopic spine surgery.

Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal DisordersVol. 16(2)
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.