Identification of Heavy Metal Sources and Health Risk Assessment in Coal Mining Area Soils Using Mercury Isotopes and Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) Model

This investigation focuses on anthropogenic impacts on metallic element distribution within coal mining ecosystems, particularly addressing soil contamination risks in the Linhuan region. Researchers conducted comprehensive sampling and analysis of surface soil contaminants, specifically quantifying mercury, copper, zinc, iron, aluminum, and lead concentrations. Through integrated application of receptor modeling (PMF) and mercury isotopic fingerprinting methodology, this study established a quantitative assessment framework for pollution source apportionment. The multi-technique approach enables precise identification of contamination pathways and proportional contributions from different anthropogenic activities in the mining environment. Coupled with a human health risk assessment model, the health risks associated with specific sources were evaluated. The results indicate that the concentrations of Hg, Cu, Zn, Fe, Al, and Pb in the soil of the study area are 9.49, 2.80, 4.01, 11.79, 6.32, and 1.03 times the soil background values, respectively, suggesting a certain degree of enrichment of these six heavy metals in the soil. The PMF source contribution results show that the soil heavy metals in the study area have three sources: natural soil formation, a mixture of coal combustion and traffic activities, and coal mining activities, with contribution rates of 31.23%, 31.59%, and 37.18%, respectively. The health risk assessment results for specific sources indicate that the non-carcinogenic risks of soil heavy metals in the local area require sufficient attention. Hg is the main cause of non-carcinogenic health risks for both groups, making it a priority element for controlling soil heavy metal health risks. Coal mining activities are the main source (52.4%) of non-carcinogenic risks, making them a priority control source for soil heavy metal health risks in the study area. These findings provide a theoretical basis for enhancing the refined management of heavy metal pollution and the prevention of health risks in soils of coal mining areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104334
Primary Topic
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Heavy Metal Sources and Health Risk Assessment in Coal Mining Area Soils Using Mercury Isotopes and Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) Model

Hua Cheng, Xing Chen, Chang Li, Liugen Zheng
Sustainability
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
article

Identification of Heavy Metal Sources and Health Risk Assessment in Coal Mining Area Soils Using Mercury Isotopes and Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) Model

Hua Cheng, Xing Chen, Chang Li, Liugen Zheng
article en

Abstract

This investigation focuses on anthropogenic impacts on metallic element distribution within coal mining ecosystems, particularly addressing soil contamination risks in the Linhuan region. Researchers conducted comprehensive sampling and analysis of surface soil contaminants, specifically quantifying mercury, copper, zinc, iron, aluminum, and lead concentrations. Through integrated application of receptor modeling (PMF) and mercury isotopic fingerprinting methodology, this study established a quantitative assessment framework for pollution source apportionment. The multi-technique approach enables precise identification of contamination pathways and proportional contributions from different anthropogenic activities in the mining environment. Coupled with a human health risk assessment model, the health risks associated with specific sources were evaluated. The results indicate that the concentrations of Hg, Cu, Zn, Fe, Al, and Pb in the soil of the study area are 9.49, 2.80, 4.01, 11.79, 6.32, and 1.03 times the soil background values, respectively, suggesting a certain degree of enrichment of these six heavy metals in the soil. The PMF source contribution results show that the soil heavy metals in the study area have three sources: natural soil formation, a mixture of coal combustion and traffic activities, and coal mining activities, with contribution rates of 31.23%, 31.59%, and 37.18%, respectively. The health risk assessment results for specific sources indicate that the non-carcinogenic risks of soil heavy metals in the local area require sufficient attention. Hg is the main cause of non-carcinogenic health risks for both groups, making it a priority element for controlling soil heavy metal health risks. Coal mining activities are the main source (52.4%) of non-carcinogenic risks, making them a priority control source for soil heavy metal health risks in the study area. These findings provide a theoretical basis for enhancing the refined management of heavy metal pollution and the prevention of health risks in soils of coal mining areas.

SustainabilityVol. 17(10)
Anhui Jianzhu University (CN), Anhui University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.