Polarisation through deviation discourse: strategic usage of Europeanisation by political and media actors in Georgia

This paper questions how political and media actors instrumentalise the Europeanisation discourse as a major mechanism of polarisation in Georgia. For this purpose, we link the three "logics of action" related to the strategic usage of Europeanisation with "interpretative" and "positional" aspects of affective polarisation. We address the subject matter through the triangulation of quantitative and qualitative research methods. The findings reveal that the discourse of <i>deviation from the European course</i> has been shaping both political and media polarisation in Georgia since 2021. By enacting respective blame games<i>,</i> political and media actors from the governmental and oppositional camps have reinforced affective polarisation in Georgia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
East European Politics
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2025.2491139
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polarisation through deviation discourse: strategic usage of Europeanisation by political and media actors in Georgia

Lia Tsuladze, Nino Abzianidze
East European Politics
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Polarisation through deviation discourse: strategic usage of Europeanisation by political and media actors in Georgia

Lia Tsuladze, Nino Abzianidze
article en

Abstract

This paper questions how political and media actors instrumentalise the Europeanisation discourse as a major mechanism of polarisation in Georgia. For this purpose, we link the three "logics of action" related to the strategic usage of Europeanisation with "interpretative" and "positional" aspects of affective polarisation. We address the subject matter through the triangulation of quantitative and qualitative research methods. The findings reveal that the discourse of <i>deviation from the European course</i> has been shaping both political and media polarisation in Georgia since 2021. By enacting respective blame games<i>,</i> political and media actors from the governmental and oppositional camps have reinforced affective polarisation in Georgia.

East European PoliticsVol. 41(2)
Tbilisi State University (GE), Georgian Institute of Public Affairs (GE), Center for Social Sciences (GE)
European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Polarisation through deviation discourse: strategic usage of Europeanisation by political and media actors in Georgia — Lia Tsuladze, Nino Abzianidze · East European Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS