Evaluation of MANET Routing Protocols: Effects of Terrain Dimensions and Network Scalability

Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks or MANETs are a category of wireless networks. These networks do not use any infrastructure unlike traditional wired networks, and the data packets are sent over to the destination as multi-hop. Since the network is ad-hoc, it uses mobile nodes to forward the data packets which lead to the formation of several topologies, making the network dynamic in nature. Terrain dimensions are used for an area of land or a type of land when considering the physical features of a designed scenario. Because of the dynamic nature, MANETs may quickly scale to handle a high number of nodes, making them ideal for large-scale applications. They can also handle dynamic changes in network topology, such as adding or removing nodes. This dynamic nature of the network makes the traditional routing protocols inefficient and of no use in this case. Furthermore, the number of mobile nodes to be added or removed from the network over different terrain dimensions makes MANETs scalable in nature. Hence, in this study, we discuss the performance analysis of MANET routing protocols over different scalability levels and terrain dimensions by using the NS-3.27 simulator. The major contribution of this research work is to analyze these two important network factors which may help to the researchers to use this study as a base to do further experimental work on other ad-hoc networks. The various metrics over which the performance of these routing protocols is measured are Throughput, Goodput, Receive Rate and Packets Received. Over the designed scenario, the selection of the best routing protocol is achieved. It is observed that in small terrain dimensions, Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocol is best suited. In medium terrain areas, Optimized Link State routing protocol (OLSR) acted as the best routing protocol and for large terrain areas, Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) is considered as the best routing protocol.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.04.103
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of MANET Routing Protocols: Effects of Terrain Dimensions and Network Scalability

Ashima Anand, Himali Sarangal, Satveer Kour, Butta Singh et al.
1 citations
Procedia Computer Science
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
1.49
article

Evaluation of MANET Routing Protocols: Effects of Terrain Dimensions and Network Scalability

Ashima Anand, Himali Sarangal, Satveer Kour, Butta Singh, Manjit Singh, Kavita Thankur, Satnam Sungh Dub
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks or MANETs are a category of wireless networks. These networks do not use any infrastructure unlike traditional wired networks, and the data packets are sent over to the destination as multi-hop. Since the network is ad-hoc, it uses mobile nodes to forward the data packets which lead to the formation of several topologies, making the network dynamic in nature. Terrain dimensions are used for an area of land or a type of land when considering the physical features of a designed scenario. Because of the dynamic nature, MANETs may quickly scale to handle a high number of nodes, making them ideal for large-scale applications. They can also handle dynamic changes in network topology, such as adding or removing nodes. This dynamic nature of the network makes the traditional routing protocols inefficient and of no use in this case. Furthermore, the number of mobile nodes to be added or removed from the network over different terrain dimensions makes MANETs scalable in nature. Hence, in this study, we discuss the performance analysis of MANET routing protocols over different scalability levels and terrain dimensions by using the NS-3.27 simulator. The major contribution of this research work is to analyze these two important network factors which may help to the researchers to use this study as a base to do further experimental work on other ad-hoc networks. The various metrics over which the performance of these routing protocols is measured are Throughput, Goodput, Receive Rate and Packets Received. Over the designed scenario, the selection of the best routing protocol is achieved. It is observed that in small terrain dimensions, Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocol is best suited. In medium terrain areas, Optimized Link State routing protocol (OLSR) acted as the best routing protocol and for large terrain areas, Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) is considered as the best routing protocol.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 259
Guru Nanak Dev University (IN), Sri Sai University (IN), Tata Consultancy Services (India) (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.