Instructional Leadership of Novice Principals: Construction and Validation of Assessment Indicators

This study developed an indicator system of instructional leadership by novice principals to facilitate the assessment of their leadership capabilities. This study employed a survey-based approach consisting of three studies to examine the reliability and validity of the proposed system and explored the perceived importance and actual performance of these indicators. The statistical techniques included expert review, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency reliability analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, cross-validation, measurement invariance analysis, and IPA. The proposed indicator system, consisting of 5 dimensions and 24 specific indicators, demonstrates good reliability and validity for assessing the overall, dimensional, and specific indicators of instructional leadership performance. Highly rated dimensions were enhancing school curriculum and instructional quality as well as creating supportive teaching and learning environments. Developing a vision for teaching and setting goals and tasks was also considered important; however, performance was relatively low.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Interciencia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59671/anti7
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Instructional Leadership of Novice Principals: Construction and Validation of Assessment Indicators

Hsieh-Chih Lai, Hsin-Yi Lien
Interciencia
Educational Innovations and Challenges
article

Instructional Leadership of Novice Principals: Construction and Validation of Assessment Indicators

Hsieh-Chih Lai, Hsin-Yi Lien
article en

Abstract

This study developed an indicator system of instructional leadership by novice principals to facilitate the assessment of their leadership capabilities. This study employed a survey-based approach consisting of three studies to examine the reliability and validity of the proposed system and explored the perceived importance and actual performance of these indicators. The statistical techniques included expert review, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency reliability analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, cross-validation, measurement invariance analysis, and IPA. The proposed indicator system, consisting of 5 dimensions and 24 specific indicators, demonstrates good reliability and validity for assessing the overall, dimensional, and specific indicators of instructional leadership performance. Highly rated dimensions were enhancing school curriculum and instructional quality as well as creating supportive teaching and learning environments. Developing a vision for teaching and setting goals and tasks was also considered important; however, performance was relatively low.

Interciencia
National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.