“I'm Done”: Describing Human Reactions to Successive Robot Failure

Robots are imperfect and will often fail multiple times during interactions. Despite this, there is a knowledge gap in understanding how humans respond to successive robot failures. In a user study with 26 participants, we explored human responses to successive robot conversational errors. We found that users typically resort to reformulating their prompts, modifying the verbal tone and cadence when encountering repeated failures. A range of emotional displays emerges, including confusion, frustration, and occasional amusement, which evolve throughout the interaction. We further conducted a statistical analysis of participants' behavioral features, revealing insights that could inform automated approaches to detecting and responding to robot errors in successive failure scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/hri61500.2025.10974098
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I'm Done”: Describing Human Reactions to Successive Robot Failure

Wendy Ju, Maria Teresa Parreira, S. B. Liu
3 citations
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
7.32
article

“I'm Done”: Describing Human Reactions to Successive Robot Failure

Wendy Ju, Maria Teresa Parreira, S. B. Liu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Robots are imperfect and will often fail multiple times during interactions. Despite this, there is a knowledge gap in understanding how humans respond to successive robot failures. In a user study with 26 participants, we explored human responses to successive robot conversational errors. We found that users typically resort to reformulating their prompts, modifying the verbal tone and cadence when encountering repeated failures. A range of emotional displays emerges, including confusion, frustration, and occasional amusement, which evolve throughout the interaction. We further conducted a statistical analysis of participants' behavioral features, revealing insights that could inform automated approaches to detecting and responding to robot errors in successive failure scenarios.

Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“I'm Done”: Describing Human Reactions to Successive Robot Failure — Wendy Ju, Maria Teresa Parreira, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS