Goals vs. Rewards: Towards a Comparative Study of Objective Specification Mechanisms

In this late-breaking report, we look at two popular objective specification mechanisms for sequential decision-making problems, namely goals and rewards, and investigate how easy it would be for non-AI experts to use them effectively. Specifically, we propose a user study that allows us to test a user's ability to (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$a$</tex>) use these mechanisms to direct a robot to generate some desired behavior and (b) predict the behavior resulting from a given objective specification. We conducted a small pilot study to test the study design and report some preliminary observations made regarding the two specification mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/hri61500.2025.10973973
Primary Topic
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Goals vs. Rewards: Towards a Comparative Study of Objective Specification Mechanisms

Sarath Sreedharan, Septia Rani, Serena Booth
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
article

Goals vs. Rewards: Towards a Comparative Study of Objective Specification Mechanisms

Sarath Sreedharan, Septia Rani, Serena Booth
article en

Abstract

In this late-breaking report, we look at two popular objective specification mechanisms for sequential decision-making problems, namely goals and rewards, and investigate how easy it would be for non-AI experts to use them effectively. Specifically, we propose a user study that allows us to test a user's ability to (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$a$</tex>) use these mechanisms to direct a robot to generate some desired behavior and (b) predict the behavior resulting from a given objective specification. We conducted a small pilot study to test the study design and report some preliminary observations made regarding the two specification mechanisms.

Brown University (US), Colorado State University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.