Mixed Reality Outperforms Virtual Reality for Remote Error Resolution in Pick-and-Place Tasks

This study evaluates the performance and usability of Mixed Reality (MR), Virtual Reality (VR), and camera stream interfaces for remote error resolution tasks, such as correcting warehouse packaging errors. Specifically, we consider a scenario where a robotic arm halts after detecting an error, requiring a remote operator to intervene and resolve it via pick-and-place actions. Twenty-one participants performed simulated pick-and - place tasks using each interface. A linear mixed model (LMM) analysis of task resolution time, usability scores (SUS), and mental workload scores (NASA- TLX) showed that the MR interface outperformed both VR and camera interfaces. MR enabled significantly faster task completion, was rated higher in usability, and was perceived to be less cognitively demanding. Notably, the MR interface, which projected a virtual robot onto a physical table, provided superior spatial understanding and physical reference cues. Post-study surveys further confirmed participants' preference for MR over other interfaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/hri61500.2025.10974002
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed Reality Outperforms Virtual Reality for Remote Error Resolution in Pick-and-Place Tasks

Pamela Carreno‐Medrano, Akansel Cosgun, A. Naresh Kumar, Stephanie Simangunsong
2 citations
Augmented Reality Applications
2.55
article

Mixed Reality Outperforms Virtual Reality for Remote Error Resolution in Pick-and-Place Tasks

Pamela Carreno‐Medrano, Akansel Cosgun, A. Naresh Kumar, Stephanie Simangunsong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance and usability of Mixed Reality (MR), Virtual Reality (VR), and camera stream interfaces for remote error resolution tasks, such as correcting warehouse packaging errors. Specifically, we consider a scenario where a robotic arm halts after detecting an error, requiring a remote operator to intervene and resolve it via pick-and-place actions. Twenty-one participants performed simulated pick-and - place tasks using each interface. A linear mixed model (LMM) analysis of task resolution time, usability scores (SUS), and mental workload scores (NASA- TLX) showed that the MR interface outperformed both VR and camera interfaces. MR enabled significantly faster task completion, was rated higher in usability, and was perceived to be less cognitively demanding. Notably, the MR interface, which projected a virtual robot onto a physical table, provided superior spatial understanding and physical reference cues. Post-study surveys further confirmed participants' preference for MR over other interfaces.

Deakin University (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Augmented Reality Applications
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.