Redrawing Boundaries: Systemic Impacts of Rehabilitation Robots in Clinical Care Settings

How does the implementation of robotic systems impact patient care, therapist roles, and clinical workflows in rehabilitation care? This study presents preliminary findings on the real-world implementation of the Lokomat® robotic gait therapy device in a rehabilitation hospital, focusing on the experiences of clinicians. Through qualitative methods, including interviews and direct observations, the study identifies both anticipated benefits and unforeseen challenges. Participants expressed optimism about the device's ability to extend therapy duration, improve patient outcomes, and alleviate therapists' physical workloads. However, operational realities such as time- and labour-intensive setups and staffing constraints revealed unexpected costs, both in terms of workload and logistics. The findings highlight the need for holistic implementation approaches that address both patient-centric benefits and clinician-centric challenges to ensure the sustainable adoption of robotic systems in healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/hri61500.2025.10973928
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redrawing Boundaries: Systemic Impacts of Rehabilitation Robots in Clinical Care Settings

Damith C. Herath, Elizabeth T. Williams, Ali Asadi, Glenda Amayo Caldwell et al.
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Redrawing Boundaries: Systemic Impacts of Rehabilitation Robots in Clinical Care Settings

Damith C. Herath, Elizabeth T. Williams, Ali Asadi, Glenda Amayo Caldwell, G. B. Shaw
article en

Abstract

How does the implementation of robotic systems impact patient care, therapist roles, and clinical workflows in rehabilitation care? This study presents preliminary findings on the real-world implementation of the Lokomat® robotic gait therapy device in a rehabilitation hospital, focusing on the experiences of clinicians. Through qualitative methods, including interviews and direct observations, the study identifies both anticipated benefits and unforeseen challenges. Participants expressed optimism about the device's ability to extend therapy duration, improve patient outcomes, and alleviate therapists' physical workloads. However, operational realities such as time- and labour-intensive setups and staffing constraints revealed unexpected costs, both in terms of workload and logistics. The findings highlight the need for holistic implementation approaches that address both patient-centric benefits and clinician-centric challenges to ensure the sustainable adoption of robotic systems in healthcare.

Australian National University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of Canberra (AU), Canberra Hospital (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.