A Comparison of Object Detection and Phrase Grounding Models in Chest X-Ray Abnormality Localization Using Eye-Tracking Data

Chest diseases rank among the most prevalent and dangerous global health issues. Object detection and phrase grounding deep learning models interpret complex radiology data to as-sist healthcare professionals in diagnosis. Object detection locates abnormalities for classes, while phrase grounding lo-cates abnormalities for textual descriptions. This paper inves-tigates how text enhances abnormality localization in chest X-rays by comparing the performance and explainability of these two tasks. To establish an explainability benchmark, we proposed an automatic pipeline to generate image regions for report sentences using radiologists' eye-tracking data<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup>. The better performance - mIoU = 36% vs. 20% - and ex-plainability - Containment ratio 48% vs. 26% - of the phrase grounding model infers the effectiveness of text in enhancing chest X-ray abnormality localization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isbi60581.2025.10981290
Primary Topic
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Object Detection and Phrase Grounding Models in Chest X-Ray Abnormality Localization Using Eye-Tracking Data

Tolga Taşdizen, Elham Ghelichkhan
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
article

A Comparison of Object Detection and Phrase Grounding Models in Chest X-Ray Abnormality Localization Using Eye-Tracking Data

Tolga Taşdizen, Elham Ghelichkhan
article en

Abstract

Chest diseases rank among the most prevalent and dangerous global health issues. Object detection and phrase grounding deep learning models interpret complex radiology data to as-sist healthcare professionals in diagnosis. Object detection locates abnormalities for classes, while phrase grounding lo-cates abnormalities for textual descriptions. This paper inves-tigates how text enhances abnormality localization in chest X-rays by comparing the performance and explainability of these two tasks. To establish an explainability benchmark, we proposed an automatic pipeline to generate image regions for report sentences using radiologists' eye-tracking data<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup>. The better performance - mIoU = 36% vs. 20% - and ex-plainability - Containment ratio 48% vs. 26% - of the phrase grounding model infers the effectiveness of text in enhancing chest X-ray abnormality localization.

University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparison of Object Detection and Phrase Grounding Models in Chest X-Ray Abnormality Localization Using Eye-Tracking Data — Tolga Taşdizen, Elham Ghelichkhan · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS