Making Sense of Public Space for Robot Design

If robots are to be deployed in public places, we need to understand what factors their design should consider. Informed by sociological studies of urban settings, particularly the work of William H. Whyte and the Street Life Project, we describe four characteristics of public places that affect and are affected by robot design: (1) localism-how robot design aligns with the identity, culture, and character of the place(s) they reside within; (2) environments-the physical characteristics of the environment in which public robots operate; (3) activities- consideration for the various daily, occasional, and situational activities that are tied to place(s) robots inhabit; and (4) sociability- how people collectively and individually relate to, interact with, and make sense of robots deployed in public places. Throughout, we illustrate these characteristics with examples drawn from empirical studies of public robots. We discuss how these key characteristics of public places can inform HRI design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/hri61500.2025.10973847
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Architecture and Computational Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
66.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making Sense of Public Space for Robot Design

Bilge Mutlu, Stuart Reeves, Hannah Pelikan
7 citations
Architecture and Computational Design
66.44
article

Making Sense of Public Space for Robot Design

Bilge Mutlu, Stuart Reeves, Hannah Pelikan
article en
7 citations

Abstract

If robots are to be deployed in public places, we need to understand what factors their design should consider. Informed by sociological studies of urban settings, particularly the work of William H. Whyte and the Street Life Project, we describe four characteristics of public places that affect and are affected by robot design: (1) localism-how robot design aligns with the identity, culture, and character of the place(s) they reside within; (2) environments-the physical characteristics of the environment in which public robots operate; (3) activities- consideration for the various daily, occasional, and situational activities that are tied to place(s) robots inhabit; and (4) sociability- how people collectively and individually relate to, interact with, and make sense of robots deployed in public places. Throughout, we illustrate these characteristics with examples drawn from empirical studies of public robots. We discuss how these key characteristics of public places can inform HRI design.

Linköping University (SE), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Nottingham (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Architecture and Computational Design
66.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.