Investigating the Prediction of Cardiovascular Diseases using Different Machine Learning Methods

This study will examine the use of machine learning algorithms to predict cardiovascular disorders using a dataset of 100 patient records from many databases related to heart disease. The dataset, which was divided into training (80 records) and testing (20 records), contained characteristics including age, blood pressure, and cholesterol levels. Feature selection, outlier management, and missing value handling were all part of data preprocessing Machine learning models including Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, SVM, and Gradient Boosting were assessed for specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy. After that, Random Forest and the other models lagged behind Gradient Boosting, which outperformed all of them by sustaining an accuracy of up to 92.5%. Based on the results, ensemble methods—more especially, the usage of Random Forest and Gradient Boosting—are primarily recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iciccs65191.2025.10985574
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Prediction of Cardiovascular Diseases using Different Machine Learning Methods

P. Supriya, P. Ram Kishore Kumar Reddy, Teja Sirapu, Himanshu Kumar et al.
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Investigating the Prediction of Cardiovascular Diseases using Different Machine Learning Methods

P. Supriya, P. Ram Kishore Kumar Reddy, Teja Sirapu, Himanshu Kumar, T Sivalingam, Kiran Kumar Reddy Penubaka
article en

Abstract

This study will examine the use of machine learning algorithms to predict cardiovascular disorders using a dataset of 100 patient records from many databases related to heart disease. The dataset, which was divided into training (80 records) and testing (20 records), contained characteristics including age, blood pressure, and cholesterol levels. Feature selection, outlier management, and missing value handling were all part of data preprocessing Machine learning models including Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, SVM, and Gradient Boosting were assessed for specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy. After that, Random Forest and the other models lagged behind Gradient Boosting, which outperformed all of them by sustaining an accuracy of up to 92.5%. Based on the results, ensemble methods—more especially, the usage of Random Forest and Gradient Boosting—are primarily recommended.

Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Technology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.