Lessons Learned from Designing and Evaluating a Robot-assisted Feeding System for Out-of-Lab Use

Millions of people cannot eat independently due to a disability, and caregiver-assisted meals can make them feel self-conscious, pressured, or burdensome. Robot-assisted feeding promises to empower people with motor impairments to feed themselves. However, current research typically examines specific robotic system subcomponents and evaluates them in controlled lab settings. This leaves a gap in developing and evaluating an end-to-end system that can feed entire meals in out-of-Iab settings. We present one such system, which we developed collaboratively with two community researchers (CRs) with motor-impairments. The key challenge of developing a robot feeding system for out-of-Iab use is the varied off-nominal scenarios that inevitably arise. Our key insight is that users can overcome many off-nominals, provided customizability and control over the system. Our system improves upon the state-of-the-art with: (1) a user interface that provides substantial user customizability and control, (2) a bite selection implementation that incorporates users-in-the-Ioop to generalize across food items, and (3) portable hardware that facilitates system use in diverse environments without inhibiting user mobility. We conduct two studies to evaluate the system. In Study 1, five users with motor impairments and one CR use the system to feed themselves meals of their choice in a cafeteria, office, or conference room. In Study 2, one CR uses the system in his home for five days, feeding himself 10 meals across diverse contexts. We present 3 key lesson learned: (1) spatial contexts are numerous, customizability lets users adapt to them; (2) off-nominals will arise, variable autonomy lets users overcome them; and (3) assistive robots' benefits depend on context. We provide video footage and code on our website.<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup><sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup>https://robotfeeding.io/publications/hri25a!

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/hri61500.2025.10974182
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Robot Manipulation and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lessons Learned from Designing and Evaluating a Robot-assisted Feeding System for Out-of-Lab Use

Amal Nanavati, Ethan Kroll Gordon, Raida Karim, Rosario Scalise et al.
3 citations
Robot Manipulation and Learning
3.64
article

Lessons Learned from Designing and Evaluating a Robot-assisted Feeding System for Out-of-Lab Use

Amal Nanavati, Ethan Kroll Gordon, Raida Karim, Rosario Scalise, Hanjun Song, Taylor A. Kessler Faulkner, Maya Çakmak, Yonghua Song, A. Adithya Kashyap, Tyler Schrenk, Siddhartha S Srinivasa, Haya Bolotski, Bernie Hao Zhu, R T Qu, Vy Nguyen, S Kutty, Jonathan Ko, Liander Rainbolt
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Millions of people cannot eat independently due to a disability, and caregiver-assisted meals can make them feel self-conscious, pressured, or burdensome. Robot-assisted feeding promises to empower people with motor impairments to feed themselves. However, current research typically examines specific robotic system subcomponents and evaluates them in controlled lab settings. This leaves a gap in developing and evaluating an end-to-end system that can feed entire meals in out-of-Iab settings. We present one such system, which we developed collaboratively with two community researchers (CRs) with motor-impairments. The key challenge of developing a robot feeding system for out-of-Iab use is the varied off-nominal scenarios that inevitably arise. Our key insight is that users can overcome many off-nominals, provided customizability and control over the system. Our system improves upon the state-of-the-art with: (1) a user interface that provides substantial user customizability and control, (2) a bite selection implementation that incorporates users-in-the-Ioop to generalize across food items, and (3) portable hardware that facilitates system use in diverse environments without inhibiting user mobility. We conduct two studies to evaluate the system. In Study 1, five users with motor impairments and one CR use the system to feed themselves meals of their choice in a cafeteria, office, or conference room. In Study 2, one CR uses the system in his home for five days, feeding himself 10 meals across diverse contexts. We present 3 key lesson learned: (1) spatial contexts are numerous, customizability lets users adapt to them; (2) off-nominals will arise, variable autonomy lets users overcome them; and (3) assistive robots' benefits depend on context. We provide video footage and code on our website.<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup><sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup>https://robotfeeding.io/publications/hri25a!

University of Washington (US), University of Michigan (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Robot Manipulation and Learning
3.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.