Analysis of PFC control strategy of voltage stabilizer based on low voltage treatment

This study addresses the issue of low voltage in rural power grids by proposing a front-end Boost PFC (Power Factor Correction) rectifier with a voltage-doubling structure for a voltage stabilizer. The voltage stabilizer employs two control strategies—average current control and hysteresis current control—to achieve a stable DC bus voltage and high power factor. Through Matlab/Simulink simulations, the study compares various target parameters under these two control strategies. The results indicate that the average current control achieves a lower THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) value of $\mathbf{3. 2 0 \%}$, compared to $4.46 \%$ with hysteresis current control, while both strategies reach a high power factor ($\mathrm{PF}=\mathbf{0. 9 9}$).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icsgge64667.2025.10984598
Primary Topic
Advanced DC-DC Converters
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of PFC control strategy of voltage stabilizer based on low voltage treatment

Chun Chen, Miao Huang, Jian Zhuang, Jialong Yang
Advanced DC-DC Converters
article

Analysis of PFC control strategy of voltage stabilizer based on low voltage treatment

Chun Chen, Miao Huang, Jian Zhuang, Jialong Yang
article en

Abstract

This study addresses the issue of low voltage in rural power grids by proposing a front-end Boost PFC (Power Factor Correction) rectifier with a voltage-doubling structure for a voltage stabilizer. The voltage stabilizer employs two control strategies—average current control and hysteresis current control—to achieve a stable DC bus voltage and high power factor. Through Matlab/Simulink simulations, the study compares various target parameters under these two control strategies. The results indicate that the average current control achieves a lower THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) value of $\mathbf{3. 2 0 \%}$, compared to $4.46 \%$ with hysteresis current control, while both strategies reach a high power factor ($\mathrm{PF}=\mathbf{0. 9 9}$).

State Grid Corporation of China (China) (CN), Shanghai University of Electric Power (CN), Shanghai Electric (China) (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Advanced DC-DC Converters
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.