Characterizing sEMG Feature Errors in Lower Limb Muscles Due to Electrode Location and Skin–Electrode Interface Changes

Surface electromyography (sEMG) is popular for monitoring muscle activation. However, it remains underutilized in clinical settings such as stroke rehabilitation. This is largely due to inter-session errors from variabilities in electrode location, the skin-electrode interface, and other inter-session effects. These errors obscure the ability to attribute sEMG signal changes to physiological patient changes. In this study, we quantified different sources of error by applying high-density sEMG (HDsEMG) arrays on the gastrocnemius medialis, tibialis anterior, semitendinosus, and tensor fascia latae of 12 healthy participants performing isometric and dynamic exercises common in stroke assessments. Between exercise sets (sessions), we shifted and reapplied HDsEMG arrays to analyze three error conditions: 1) same session errors (SSE) arising from changes in the recording electrode and electrode location, 2) same location errors (SLE) from changes in recording electrodes at the same location across sessions, and 3) same electrode errors (SEE) from comparing the same recording electrode at a different location across sessions. For SSE, frequency-domain features (mean, median, peak frequency) showed <30% error at <10cm between electrodes. Time-domain features (integrated EMG, max envelope amplitude) exhibited greater errors, with the tensor fasciae latae exhibiting >50% error at 10cm between electrodes. Contrastingly, we saw <19% error across frequency- and time-domain features for SLE and SEE after correcting for differences in electrode location using SSE trends. These results show differences in electrode location were most responsible for sEMG feature errors. Thus, accounting for electrode location could improve inter-session sEMG feature comparisons, enhancing the viability of sEMG-informed physiological assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2025.3568954
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing sEMG Feature Errors in Lower Limb Muscles Due to Electrode Location and Skin–Electrode Interface Changes

Calvin Kuo, Fraser J. Douglas, Mona Pei
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
0.67
article

Characterizing sEMG Feature Errors in Lower Limb Muscles Due to Electrode Location and Skin–Electrode Interface Changes

Calvin Kuo, Fraser J. Douglas, Mona Pei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Surface electromyography (sEMG) is popular for monitoring muscle activation. However, it remains underutilized in clinical settings such as stroke rehabilitation. This is largely due to inter-session errors from variabilities in electrode location, the skin-electrode interface, and other inter-session effects. These errors obscure the ability to attribute sEMG signal changes to physiological patient changes. In this study, we quantified different sources of error by applying high-density sEMG (HDsEMG) arrays on the gastrocnemius medialis, tibialis anterior, semitendinosus, and tensor fascia latae of 12 healthy participants performing isometric and dynamic exercises common in stroke assessments. Between exercise sets (sessions), we shifted and reapplied HDsEMG arrays to analyze three error conditions: 1) same session errors (SSE) arising from changes in the recording electrode and electrode location, 2) same location errors (SLE) from changes in recording electrodes at the same location across sessions, and 3) same electrode errors (SEE) from comparing the same recording electrode at a different location across sessions. For SSE, frequency-domain features (mean, median, peak frequency) showed <30% error at <10cm between electrodes. Time-domain features (integrated EMG, max envelope amplitude) exhibited greater errors, with the tensor fasciae latae exhibiting >50% error at 10cm between electrodes. Contrastingly, we saw <19% error across frequency- and time-domain features for SLE and SEE after correcting for differences in electrode location using SSE trends. These results show differences in electrode location were most responsible for sEMG feature errors. Thus, accounting for electrode location could improve inter-session sEMG feature comparisons, enhancing the viability of sEMG-informed physiological assessments.

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementVol. 74
University of British Columbia (CA)
Canada Foundation for Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.