Radio-Opaque Artefacts in Digital Mammography: Automatic Detection and Analysis of Downstream Effects

This study investigates the effects of radio-opaque artefacts, such as skin markers, breast implants, and pacemakers, on mammography classification models. After manually anno-tating 22,012 mammograms from the publicly available EM-BED dataset, a robust multi-label artefact detector was de-veloped to identify five distinct artefact types (circular and triangular skin markers, breast implants, support devices and spot compression structures). Subsequent experiments on two clinically relevant tasks - breast density assessment and can-cer screening - revealed that these artefacts can significantly affect model performance, alter classification thresholds, and distort output distributions. These findings underscore the im-portance of accurate automatic artefact detection for developing reliable and robust classification models in digital mam-mography. To facilitate future research our annotations, code, and model predictions are made publicly available <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isbi60581.2025.10981259
Primary Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radio-Opaque Artefacts in Digital Mammography: Automatic Detection and Analysis of Downstream Effects

Ben Glocker, Mélanie Roschewitz, Amelia Schueppert
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
article

Radio-Opaque Artefacts in Digital Mammography: Automatic Detection and Analysis of Downstream Effects

Ben Glocker, Mélanie Roschewitz, Amelia Schueppert
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of radio-opaque artefacts, such as skin markers, breast implants, and pacemakers, on mammography classification models. After manually anno-tating 22,012 mammograms from the publicly available EM-BED dataset, a robust multi-label artefact detector was de-veloped to identify five distinct artefact types (circular and triangular skin markers, breast implants, support devices and spot compression structures). Subsequent experiments on two clinically relevant tasks - breast density assessment and can-cer screening - revealed that these artefacts can significantly affect model performance, alter classification thresholds, and distort output distributions. These findings underscore the im-portance of accurate automatic artefact detection for developing reliable and robust classification models in digital mam-mography. To facilitate future research our annotations, code, and model predictions are made publicly available <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup>.

Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology (RU), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Radio-Opaque Artefacts in Digital Mammography: Automatic Detection and Analysis of Downstream Effects — Ben Glocker, Mélanie Roschewitz, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS