Semi-supervised Learning - An Alternative to Traditional Breast Cancer Prediction

Breast cancer continues to create diagnostic challenges due to its overlapping and diverse characteristics, complicating the diagnosis. This study evaluates various cases for each stage of preprocessing and optimization techniques in Supervised Learning (SL) and Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) to attain optimal predictive performance. Nine machine learning classifiers were utilized for both SL and SSL Models for training and testing on the Wisconsin Diagnostic Cancer Dataset using the following algorithms: 1) Logistic Regression (LR), 2) Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), 3) Linear-SVM, 4) RBF-SVM, 5) DT, 6) RF, 7) XGBoost, 8) Gradient Boosting (GB), and 9) K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN).This process incorporated feature extraction techniques, including Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Feature Agglomeration, and feature selection through Regularization, employing both L2 and Bayesian methods. For hyperparameter optimization, a comprehensive approach Stratified K-fold and nested cross-validation was adopted and the Model has performed well by acheiving an accuracy of 99% compare to SL, which has showcased that SSL can be an alternative approach for sl when the labeled data is expensive or high computational resources are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aide64228.2025.10987549
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Semi-supervised Learning - An Alternative to Traditional Breast Cancer Prediction

Jale Subash Reddy, Sharan Sankar, Suthari Manikanta, M. Srinivas et al.
1 citations
AI in cancer detection
2.48
article

Semi-supervised Learning - An Alternative to Traditional Breast Cancer Prediction

Jale Subash Reddy, Sharan Sankar, Suthari Manikanta, M. Srinivas, Shaik Mohammed Rasheed, Avula Venkata Sai Harshendra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Breast cancer continues to create diagnostic challenges due to its overlapping and diverse characteristics, complicating the diagnosis. This study evaluates various cases for each stage of preprocessing and optimization techniques in Supervised Learning (SL) and Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) to attain optimal predictive performance. Nine machine learning classifiers were utilized for both SL and SSL Models for training and testing on the Wisconsin Diagnostic Cancer Dataset using the following algorithms: 1) Logistic Regression (LR), 2) Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), 3) Linear-SVM, 4) RBF-SVM, 5) DT, 6) RF, 7) XGBoost, 8) Gradient Boosting (GB), and 9) K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN).This process incorporated feature extraction techniques, including Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Feature Agglomeration, and feature selection through Regularization, employing both L2 and Bayesian methods. For hyperparameter optimization, a comprehensive approach Stratified K-fold and nested cross-validation was adopted and the Model has performed well by acheiving an accuracy of 99% compare to SL, which has showcased that SSL can be an alternative approach for sl when the labeled data is expensive or high computational resources are required.

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
AI in cancer detection
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Semi-supervised Learning - An Alternative to Traditional Breast Cancer Prediction — Jale Subash Reddy, Sharan Sankar, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS