Bayesian-Driven Deep Learning and Machine Learning Approaches for Handwritten Word Recognition

Identifying handwritten words poses a complicated problem owing to the variances in handwriting styles and the possible noise and distortions present in the data. The performance of used deep learning and traditional machine learning handwriting recognition methods for recognizing handwritten words is studied in this paper and the advantages of using deep learning are discussed. In particular, neural network models such as CNN and 2DLSTM networks had a great work in this area. In contrast, we detect whole handwritten words without the need of segments into standalone characters. The CNNs are used for feature extraction, the Bidirectional LSTMs for sequence prediction and output is decoded via a CTC layer. The model was evaluated over the IAM words dataset from the IAM handwriting database, achieving 87% accuracy and a character error rate of 7.77%. In addition, we experimented with ML techniques, including SVM, RF has got an accuracy of 72% and 80% accuracies, and a Bayesian network of 61% accuracy, to provide a comparative analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aide64228.2025.10987416
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian-Driven Deep Learning and Machine Learning Approaches for Handwritten Word Recognition

Medisetty Dinesh, M. Srinivas, Lingamaneni Sagar, Pallapu Moksha et al.
1 citations
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
1.28
article

Bayesian-Driven Deep Learning and Machine Learning Approaches for Handwritten Word Recognition

Medisetty Dinesh, M. Srinivas, Lingamaneni Sagar, Pallapu Moksha, Pappula Baladhitya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Identifying handwritten words poses a complicated problem owing to the variances in handwriting styles and the possible noise and distortions present in the data. The performance of used deep learning and traditional machine learning handwriting recognition methods for recognizing handwritten words is studied in this paper and the advantages of using deep learning are discussed. In particular, neural network models such as CNN and 2DLSTM networks had a great work in this area. In contrast, we detect whole handwritten words without the need of segments into standalone characters. The CNNs are used for feature extraction, the Bidirectional LSTMs for sequence prediction and output is decoded via a CTC layer. The model was evaluated over the IAM words dataset from the IAM handwriting database, achieving 87% accuracy and a character error rate of 7.77%. In addition, we experimented with ML techniques, including SVM, RF has got an accuracy of 72% and 80% accuracies, and a Bayesian network of 61% accuracy, to provide a comparative analysis.

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.