Performance Analysis of Classifier for Human Daily Activities

Human action recognition system using wearable sensors for classification of human daily activities is presented. Data collected for six daily human activities using smart phone with the help of thirty subjects is used. Thirteen time domain and two frequency domain features are extracted from the sensor data. Two machine learning algorithms namely decision tree and support vector machine and one deep learning algorithm LSTM is used for classification. The performance of the three classifiers in classifying the daily activities is evaluated using the performance metrics precision, specificity, recall, f-score and accuracy. Simulation results shows that the overall accuracy of SVM is 99.30% which is 2.88% and 0.53% higher than decision tree and LSTM respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aide64228.2025.10986794
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Analysis of Classifier for Human Daily Activities

R. Amutha
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

Performance Analysis of Classifier for Human Daily Activities

R. Amutha
article en

Abstract

Human action recognition system using wearable sensors for classification of human daily activities is presented. Data collected for six daily human activities using smart phone with the help of thirty subjects is used. Thirteen time domain and two frequency domain features are extracted from the sensor data. Two machine learning algorithms namely decision tree and support vector machine and one deep learning algorithm LSTM is used for classification. The performance of the three classifiers in classifying the daily activities is evaluated using the performance metrics precision, specificity, recall, f-score and accuracy. Simulation results shows that the overall accuracy of SVM is 99.30% which is 2.88% and 0.53% higher than decision tree and LSTM respectively.

Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.