Comparative study of Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Bayesian Models on the ORL Faces Dataset for Effectual Face Recognition

This study compares face recognition performance between machine learning, deep learning, and probabilistic reasoning models. On the ORL dataset from Kaggle, the Machine Learning (ML) model (support vector machine (SVM)) achieved a recognition accuracy of 96.25.%, The Deep Learning (DL) model convolutional neural network (CNN) achieved a recognition accuracy of 99.99.% and a Probabilistic (PR) model Bayesian network attained an accuracy of 90.%. This analysis emphasizes CNN’s superior accuracy in face recognition, especially on large-scale datasets, while also illuminating the comparatively limited effectiveness of Bayesian Networks with PCA and SVM for dimensionality reduction and classification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aide64228.2025.10986852
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Bayesian Models on the ORL Faces Dataset for Effectual Face Recognition

K S Divya, Ayush Pandey, M. B. Srinivas, Vivek Vignesh Baggam et al.
1 citations
Face recognition and analysis
1.28
article

Comparative study of Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Bayesian Models on the ORL Faces Dataset for Effectual Face Recognition

K S Divya, Ayush Pandey, M. B. Srinivas, Vivek Vignesh Baggam, Rushika Manchala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study compares face recognition performance between machine learning, deep learning, and probabilistic reasoning models. On the ORL dataset from Kaggle, the Machine Learning (ML) model (support vector machine (SVM)) achieved a recognition accuracy of 96.25.%, The Deep Learning (DL) model convolutional neural network (CNN) achieved a recognition accuracy of 99.99.% and a Probabilistic (PR) model Bayesian network attained an accuracy of 90.%. This analysis emphasizes CNN’s superior accuracy in face recognition, especially on large-scale datasets, while also illuminating the comparatively limited effectiveness of Bayesian Networks with PCA and SVM for dimensionality reduction and classification.

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Face recognition and analysis
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative study of Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Bayesian Models on the ORL Faces Dataset for Effectual Face Recognition — K S Divya, Ayush Pandey, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS