Comparison of Milk Quality Grades Using the Logistic Model Tree Algorithm
This study aims to track and categorize milk quality grades using the Logistic Model Tree (LMT) algorithm, based on the analysis of 1,059 milk samples. The focus of the research is to evaluate key factors such as pH value, taste, smell, fat content, concentration, and color, which play a crucial role in determining the overall quality of milk. The goal is to create an efficient and standardized process for sorting cow's milk, which can save significant time and resources in the dairy industry. To identify the most suitable algorithm for this task, the research team initially tested 12 different algorithms, assessing their performance in predicting milk quality. Among these, the Logistic Model Tree (LMT) emerged as the most effective model, achieving an impressive accuracy rate of 99.76%. The LMT algorithm, known for combining the advantages of decision trees and logistic regression, demonstrated its ability to classify milk quality grades with high precision. The results of this study indicate that the LMT algorithm can be a valuable tool for automating the milk quality grading process. By leveraging key attributes such as pH, fat content, and color, it is possible to efficiently sort and grade milk, reducing the need for manual inspection and improving overall productivity in the dairy industry. This method offers a significant improvement over traditional quality assessment techniques and has the potential to be widely adopted for milk sorting and quality control applications.
Authors
- Brijesh Bhatt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7934-7992)
- Thanakrit Janchidfah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0438-9904)
- Phanintorn Suaprae
Institutions
- Dharmsinh Desai University (IN)
- Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University (TH)
- Muban Chombueng Rajabhat University (TH)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-04-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/icci64209.2025.10987482
- Primary Topic
- Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00