A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Neural Network, and Statistical Modeling for Music Genre Classification

A range of general features of music, such as Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients and spectrograms, is used to describe musically descriptive confines of different genres. While such a comparison is made between traditional machine learning models, like SVMs and random forests, with the more elaborative work on deep-learning architectures like CNNs, RNNs, and probabilistic techniques like Bayesian networks, which capture uncertainty and perhaps provide a more fine-grained prediction. Deep-learning models, especially CNNs, appear to achieve high accuracies in music genre classification over the GTZAN dataset. Probabilistic models, however, have the advantage of handling noisy or incomplete data by enforcing some meaningful interpretation of the underlying relations between features and genres. This research provides a thorough comparison of these techniques and aids in improving the music genre classification systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aide64228.2025.10987409
Primary Topic
Music and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Neural Network, and Statistical Modeling for Music Genre Classification

T. Deepika, M. B. Srinivas, Priyanka Kumar, V. Hari Shankar Dinesh et al.
Music and Audio Processing
article

A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Neural Network, and Statistical Modeling for Music Genre Classification

T. Deepika, M. B. Srinivas, Priyanka Kumar, V. Hari Shankar Dinesh, Vishnu Vardhan Kollipara
article en

Abstract

A range of general features of music, such as Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients and spectrograms, is used to describe musically descriptive confines of different genres. While such a comparison is made between traditional machine learning models, like SVMs and random forests, with the more elaborative work on deep-learning architectures like CNNs, RNNs, and probabilistic techniques like Bayesian networks, which capture uncertainty and perhaps provide a more fine-grained prediction. Deep-learning models, especially CNNs, appear to achieve high accuracies in music genre classification over the GTZAN dataset. Probabilistic models, however, have the advantage of handling noisy or incomplete data by enforcing some meaningful interpretation of the underlying relations between features and genres. This research provides a thorough comparison of these techniques and aids in improving the music genre classification systems.

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Music and Audio Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Neural Network, and Statistical Modeling for Music Genre Classification — T. Deepika, M. B. Srinivas, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS