Is Fitting Error a Reliable Metric for Assessing Deformable Motion Correction in Quantitative MRI?

Quantitative MR (qMR) can provide numerical values representing the physical and chemical properties of the tissues. To collect a series of frames under varying settings, retrospective motion correction is essential to align the corresponding anatomical points or features. Under the assumption that the misalignment makes the discrepancy between the corresponding features larger, fitting error is a commonly used evaluation metric for motion correction in qMR. This study evaluates the reliability of the fitting error metric in cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) after deformable registration. We found that while fitting error correlates with the negative eigenvalues, the negative Jacobian Determinant increases with broken cardiomyocytes, indicated by helix angle gradient line profiles. Since fitting error measures the distance between moved points and their re-rendered counterparts, the fitting parameter itself may be adjusted due to poor registration. Therefore, fitting error in deformable registration itself is a necessary but not sufficient metric and should be combined with other metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isbi60581.2025.10980726
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Fitting Error a Reliable Metric for Assessing Deformable Motion Correction in Quantitative MRI?

Fanwen Wang, K.-C. Wen, Andrew D. Scott, Yinzhe Wu et al.
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Is Fitting Error a Reliable Metric for Assessing Deformable Motion Correction in Quantitative MRI?

Fanwen Wang, K.-C. Wen, Andrew D. Scott, Yinzhe Wu, Yaqing Luo, Sònia Nielles‐Vallespin, Dudley J. Pennell, Guang Yang, Pedro Ferreira, Jiahao Huang
article en

Abstract

Quantitative MR (qMR) can provide numerical values representing the physical and chemical properties of the tissues. To collect a series of frames under varying settings, retrospective motion correction is essential to align the corresponding anatomical points or features. Under the assumption that the misalignment makes the discrepancy between the corresponding features larger, fitting error is a commonly used evaluation metric for motion correction in qMR. This study evaluates the reliability of the fitting error metric in cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) after deformable registration. We found that while fitting error correlates with the negative eigenvalues, the negative Jacobian Determinant increases with broken cardiomyocytes, indicated by helix angle gradient line profiles. Since fitting error measures the distance between moved points and their re-rendered counterparts, the fitting parameter itself may be adjusted due to poor registration. Therefore, fitting error in deformable registration itself is a necessary but not sufficient metric and should be combined with other metrics.

Imperial College London (GB)
British Heart Foundation, Royal Society, Medical Research Council, NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is Fitting Error a Reliable Metric for Assessing Deformable Motion Correction in Quantitative MRI? — Fanwen Wang, K.-C. Wen, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS