Intelligent Email Spam Detection: A Machine Learning-Based Approach

Email spam emails frequently contain dangerous material like viruses, phishing attempts, and fraudulent schemes. Email spam detection is an essential component of cybersecurity. Machine learning models are required to increase accuracy and efficiency because traditional rule-based filtering strategies are insufficient to handle developing spam techniques. This study investigates how well five popular machine learning algorithms—Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, and Multinomial Naïve Bayes (MultinomialNB) to detect and categorize spam emails. Different methods are used by each of these models to examine email content and detect spam. MultinomialNB is a probabilistic classifier founded on the Bayes theorem, excels at text classification problems. By merging several decision trees, Random Forest, an ensemble learning technique, improves generalization and decreases overfitting while increasing prediction accuracy. A linear model for binary classification called logistic regression uses learned weights for several features to calculate the likelihood that an email is spam. SVM, a potent classification method, finds the best hyperplane in a high-dimensional space to distinguish between spam and non-spam emails. A rule-based approach called a Decision Tree uses a hierarchical structure of decision nodes to classify emails, making it simple to use and analyze. A dataset of tagged spam and non-spam emails is used to assess the performance of these models. To ensure a thorough evaluation of the model, the dataset is divided into training and testing sets. To compare the efficacy of the models, evaluation criteria accuracy is employed. While all models perform well, the results show that SVM offer superior accuracy and achieved 98.45% accuracy. The results emphasize how crucial it is to choose the right machine learning models depending on the properties of the dataset, available computing power, and intended performance indicators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictmim65579.2025.10988140
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligent Email Spam Detection: A Machine Learning-Based Approach

Vinod Jain
5 citations
Spam and Phishing Detection
16.23
article

Intelligent Email Spam Detection: A Machine Learning-Based Approach

Vinod Jain
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Email spam emails frequently contain dangerous material like viruses, phishing attempts, and fraudulent schemes. Email spam detection is an essential component of cybersecurity. Machine learning models are required to increase accuracy and efficiency because traditional rule-based filtering strategies are insufficient to handle developing spam techniques. This study investigates how well five popular machine learning algorithms—Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, and Multinomial Naïve Bayes (MultinomialNB) to detect and categorize spam emails. Different methods are used by each of these models to examine email content and detect spam. MultinomialNB is a probabilistic classifier founded on the Bayes theorem, excels at text classification problems. By merging several decision trees, Random Forest, an ensemble learning technique, improves generalization and decreases overfitting while increasing prediction accuracy. A linear model for binary classification called logistic regression uses learned weights for several features to calculate the likelihood that an email is spam. SVM, a potent classification method, finds the best hyperplane in a high-dimensional space to distinguish between spam and non-spam emails. A rule-based approach called a Decision Tree uses a hierarchical structure of decision nodes to classify emails, making it simple to use and analyze. A dataset of tagged spam and non-spam emails is used to assess the performance of these models. To ensure a thorough evaluation of the model, the dataset is divided into training and testing sets. To compare the efficacy of the models, evaluation criteria accuracy is employed. While all models perform well, the results show that SVM offer superior accuracy and achieved 98.45% accuracy. The results emphasize how crucial it is to choose the right machine learning models depending on the properties of the dataset, available computing power, and intended performance indicators.

GLA University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Spam and Phishing Detection
16.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.